From: Ben (bmunyao@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2007 - 03:40:46 ART
Sounds like something one might encounter in the exam.
Ben
On 8/1/07, Toh Soon, Lim <tohsoon28@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Shine,
>
> Just curious, what's the practicality of modifying the AD of a connected
> route (AD=0) to some higher value (in your example, AD of external EIGRP,
> i.e. 170)? Do you encounter this requirement in your lab workbooks or
> elsewhere?
>
> I'm kinda confused. Please clarify.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> B.Rgds,
> Lim TS
>
>
> On 7/31/07, CCIE 19999 <ccie@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there a way actually you can make a connected prefix appear as
> > external?
> >
> > For example, 151.10.1.2 is a connected interface on R1 and the routing
> > protocol is EIGRP.
> >
> > I am wondering if it is possible to make the prefix appear as D EX in
> > router
> > R1 instead of as Connected.
> >
> >
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Shine
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART