Re: We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost.

From: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Date: Sun Jul 22 2007 - 00:24:45 ART

• Next message: Ben: "vtp across transparent mode switch"
• Previous message: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Maybe in reply to: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Next in thread: Darby Weaver: "Re: We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Even smarter these people. The TCP protocol is designed to
have packet lost. And they can just come up with more and more
sophisticated queues every month to "prevent packet lost".

It is designed to have packet lost, and they come to their
work every day to "prevent packet lost". How smart is that.

They will never need to create any thing and they have
a job guaranteed for life.

This is like the lawyers working with law makers to come up
with more sophisticated forms to do the same thing every
month so that citizens need lawyers.

• Next message: Ben: "vtp across transparent mode switch"
• Previous message: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Maybe in reply to: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Next in thread: Darby Weaver: "Re: We want to prevent packet lost? But TCP needs packet lost."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART