From: Con Spathas (con@spathas.net)
Date: Sun Jul 15 2007 - 02:23:37 ART
Sorry Greg - I should elaborate - this wasn't for a lab!
The topology required 3 physical ethernet interfaces for a production
environment but the 2811's only come with two onboard.
Most cost-effective option at the time was to whack in a HWIC.
_____
From: Greg Wendel [mailto:gwendel@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 15 July 2007 06:01
To: Con Spathas
Cc: Radioactive Frog; Chamara Peris; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Confusion on HWIC-4ESW
Do you get any advantage over just using an extra loopback address?
On 7/14/07, Con Spathas <con@spathas.net> wrote:
I've used the HWIC-4ESW in 2811's to get "extra" ports for routing. Works a
charm!
_____
From: Radioactive Frog [mailto:pbhatkoti@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 15 July 2007 03:25
To: Con Spathas
Cc: Chamara Peris; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Confusion on HWIC-4ESW
I don't see why it shouldn't work. Can someone labb it?
Frog
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART