Re: BGP Doubt

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 11 2007 - 12:46:45 ART


hey Mark,

So are you doing a Hub and Spoke setup? If yes, are you using a
multipoint sub interface on the hub or point-to-point sub interfaces?

Is possible, can u sketch something out? - Always helps ppl understand
the topology..

On 7/11/07, CCIE W <wan2bccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Could someone please help me, in following issue,
>
> Scenario: I have configured 3 dynamips routers connected via FR switch.
> Inverse-ARP is disabled. 2 PVCs are configured Rtr A to Rtr B, & Rtr B to
> Rtr C
> All 3 routers are in different BGP AS & are ebgp peers.
>
> Problem : Routes advertised on Rtr B (by Rtr A) are advertised to Rtr C with
> next hop IP of Rtr A. (Normally due to EBGP relation, the next hop should
> have been Rtr B). I think this is happening due to Multi-access environment,
> But when I try setting the next-hop-self on Rtr B for neighbor C, it gives
> following error
>
> %BGP: next-hop-self is implied for an eBGP peer, there is no need to
> configure it
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART