Re: BGP Doubt

From: CCIE W (wan2bccie@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 11 2007 - 13:07:07 ART


Hi Sadiq,

I am using main interface on all routers with same ip subnet.but not full
mesh

R1 ;-

interface Loopback0
 ip address 100.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 serial restart-delay 0
 no dce-terminal-timing-enable
 frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 102 broadcast
 no frame-relay inverse-arp

router bgp 65101
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 100.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 65102
 no auto-summary

SH IP BGP :-

BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 10.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 100.1.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 200.1.1.0 10.1.1.2 0 0 65102 i
R2 :-

interface Loopback0
 ip address 200.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 serial restart-delay 0
 no dce-terminal-timing-enable
 frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.1 201 broadcast
 frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.3 203 broadcast
 no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
router bgp 65102
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 200.1.1.0
 neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 65101
 neighbor 10.1.1.3 remote-as 65103
 no auto-summary
!

SH IP BGP :-

BGP table version is 11, local router ID is 10.1.1.2
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 100.1.1.0/24 10.1.1.1 0 0 65101 i
*> 200.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i

R3:--

interface Serial1/0
 ip address 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 serial restart-delay 0
 no dce-terminal-timing-enable
 frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 302 broadcast
 no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
router bgp 65103
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 65102
 no auto-summary

SH IP BGP

BGP table version is 13, local router ID is 10.1.1.3
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
**> 100.1.1.0/24 10.1.1.1 0 65102 65101 i*
*> 200.1.1.0 10.1.1.2 0 0 65102 i

Problem is here bold and underline

HTH

Thanks Mark
-----Original Message-----

From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[*mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com*<nobody@groupstudy.com>]
On Behalf Of Sadiq Yakasai

Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 21:17

To: CCIE W

Cc: Cisco certification

Subject: Re: BGP Doubt

hey Mark,

So are you doing a Hub and Spoke setup? If yes, are you using a multipoint
sub interface on the hub or point-to-point sub interfaces?

Is possible, can u sketch something out? - Always helps ppl understand the
topology..

On 7/11/07, CCIE W <wan2bccie@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear All,

>

>

> Could someone please help me, in following issue,

>

> Scenario: I have configured 3 dynamips routers connected via FR switch.

> Inverse-ARP is disabled. 2 PVCs are configured Rtr A to Rtr B, & Rtr B

> to Rtr C All 3 routers are in different BGP AS & are ebgp peers.

>

> Problem : Routes advertised on Rtr B (by Rtr A) are advertised to Rtr

> C with next hop IP of Rtr A. (Normally due to EBGP relation, the next

> hop should have been Rtr B). I think this is happening due to

> Multi-access environment, But when I try setting the next-hop-self on

> Rtr B for neighbor C, it gives following error

>

> %BGP: next-hop-self is implied for an eBGP peer, there is no need to

> configure it

>

>

>

> Thanks

> Mark.

>

> ______________________________________________________________________

> _ Subscription information may be found at:

> *http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html*>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART