From: Eric Dobyns (eric_dobyns@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2007 - 11:09:31 ART
Tried it to see. Neighbor adjacency only comes up when you place it on the
virtual-template. I was surprised. I set the frame up ptp, I suppose you
might get it up with multipoint at the hub and neighbor statements, but I
didn't try it to see.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 2:52 AM
To: Gary Duncanson
Cc: eric_dobyns@yahoo.com; Narbik Kocharians; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: PPPoFR
I would place it on the loopback, the interface with an IP address.
On 7/5/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I will take a punt and say the the loopback.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Dobyns" <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
> To: "'Narbik Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>; "'Gary Duncanson'"
> <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:18 PM
> Subject: RE: PPPoFR
>
>
> > Here's a question for you:
> >
> > If I were going to add the command "ip ospf 1 area 0" to one of the
> > interfaces for that frame link, would I add it to the serial
> subinterface,
> > the virtual template or the loopback?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Narbik Kocharians
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 1:58 PM
> > To: Gary Duncanson
> > Cc: Eric Dobyns; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
> >
> > No worries mate
> >
> > On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Narbik, and thanks Eric for the config you posted.
> >>
> >> I can see how you would get a reply using the loopback interface.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> *From:* Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
> >> *To:* Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
> >> *Cc:* eric_dobyns@yahoo.com ; Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> ;
> >> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 04, 2007 8:38 PM
> >> *Subject:* Re: PPPoFR
> >>
> >>
> >> I see your point, but this will also satisfy the requirement.
> >>
> >> On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > No Advanced R&S Workbook here, but a similar situation did come up on
> >> > lab 3
> >> > in my IPExpert Version 9.0 Workbook by Scott Morris starting on page
> >> > 43!
> >> >
> >> > Does the ' you will be pinging another interface' hold up then if you
> >> > use
> >> > ipunnumbered?
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Eric Dobyns" < eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
> >> > To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Narbik
> >> > Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: <swm@emanon.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com >
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:44 PM
> >> > Subject: RE: PPPoFR
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > That would be Lab 7 in your CCIE Advanced R&S Workbook, by Narbik
> >> > > Kocharians....starting on page 60...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> >> > Of
> >> > > Gary
> >> > > Duncanson
> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:46 AM
> >> > > To: Narbik Kocharians
> >> > > Cc: swm@emanon.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Narbik,
> >> > >
> >> > > Now that's interesting, how will that work for PPPoFR? How does
> that
> >> > > satisfy
> >> > > the need to ping your own IP address in terms of the IP address
> >> > assigned
> >> > > to
> >> > > your physical or subinterface used for a FR PVC?
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > > Gary
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: Narbik Kocharians
> >> > > To: Gary Duncanson
> >> > > Cc: Phillip Day ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:11 PM
> >> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Use the "ip unnumbered lo0" to assign an IP address, that way you
> >> > should
> >> > > be
> >> > > able to ping your own IP address.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Had this one myself recently.
> >> > >
> >> > > This insight came from Scott Morris..
> >> > >
> >> > > 'If you are doing PPPoFR, you will never be able to ping your
> own
> >> > IP
> >> > > address.
> >> > >
> >> > > (Unless you use unnumbered from another interface, but
> technically
> >> > then
> >> > > you
> >> > > are pinging that one!)'
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: "Phillip Day" < Phillip.Day@telindus.co.uk>
> >> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:13 AM
> >> > > Subject: PPPoFR
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Does anyone know of an obvious way I'm missing to ping your
> >> > > local
> >> >
> >> > > > interface on a PPPoFR link? And in a lab is it likely you
> would
> >> > need
> >> > > to
> >> > > > be able to?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks in advance
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Phill Day
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the
> >> > > intended
> >> > > > recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by telephone
> >> > and
> >> > > confirm
> >> > > > that it has been deleted from your system and any copies
> >> > destroyed.
> >> > > If
> >> > > > you
> >> > > > are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited
> from
> >> > > using,
> >> > > > printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail
> or
> >> > any
> >> > > > information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavours to
> >> > virus
> >> > > scan
> >> > > > all
> >> > > > e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that this
> >> > e-mail
> >> > > and
> >> > > > any
> >> > > > attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own
> virus
> >> > > checking.
> >> > > > The right to monitor e-mail communications through our network
> >> > > is
> >> > > reserved
> >> > > > by
> >> > > > us.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >
> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Narbik Kocharians
> >> > > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> >> > > CCSI# 30832
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Narbik Kocharians
> >> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> >> CCSI# 30832
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Narbik Kocharians
> > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > CCSI# 30832
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART