From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2007 - 11:27:08 ART
Looks like something I should try at home. Interesting.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Dobyns" <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
To: "'Ben'" <bmunyao@gmail.com>; "'Gary Duncanson'"
<gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
Cc: "'Narbik Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: PPPoFR
> Tried it to see. Neighbor adjacency only comes up when you place it on
> the
> virtual-template. I was surprised. I set the frame up ptp, I suppose you
> might get it up with multipoint at the hub and neighbor statements, but I
> didn't try it to see.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ben
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 2:52 AM
> To: Gary Duncanson
> Cc: eric_dobyns@yahoo.com; Narbik Kocharians; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>
> I would place it on the loopback, the interface with an IP address.
>
>
> On 7/5/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I will take a punt and say the the loopback.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Eric Dobyns" <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
>> To: "'Narbik Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>; "'Gary Duncanson'"
>> <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:18 PM
>> Subject: RE: PPPoFR
>>
>>
>> > Here's a question for you:
>> >
>> > If I were going to add the command "ip ospf 1 area 0" to one of the
>> > interfaces for that frame link, would I add it to the serial
>> subinterface,
>> > the virtual template or the loopback?
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> > Narbik Kocharians
>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 1:58 PM
>> > To: Gary Duncanson
>> > Cc: Eric Dobyns; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>> >
>> > No worries mate
>> >
>> > On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Narbik, and thanks Eric for the config you posted.
>> >>
>> >> I can see how you would get a reply using the loopback interface.
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>
>> >> *From:* Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
>> >> *To:* Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>> >> *Cc:* eric_dobyns@yahoo.com ; Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> ;
>> >> ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 04, 2007 8:38 PM
>> >> *Subject:* Re: PPPoFR
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I see your point, but this will also satisfy the requirement.
>> >>
>> >> On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > No Advanced R&S Workbook here, but a similar situation did come up
>> >> > on
>> >> > lab 3
>> >> > in my IPExpert Version 9.0 Workbook by Scott Morris starting on page
>> >> > 43!
>> >> >
>> >> > Does the ' you will be pinging another interface' hold up then if
>> >> > you
>> >> > use
>> >> > ipunnumbered?
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > From: "Eric Dobyns" < eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
>> >> > To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Narbik
>> >> > Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>
>> >> > Cc: <swm@emanon.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com >
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:44 PM
>> >> > Subject: RE: PPPoFR
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > That would be Lab 7 in your CCIE Advanced R&S Workbook, by Narbik
>> >> > > Kocharians....starting on page 60...
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>> Behalf
>> >> > Of
>> >> > > Gary
>> >> > > Duncanson
>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:46 AM
>> >> > > To: Narbik Kocharians
>> >> > > Cc: swm@emanon.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hi Narbik,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Now that's interesting, how will that work for PPPoFR? How does
>> that
>> >> > > satisfy
>> >> > > the need to ping your own IP address in terms of the IP address
>> >> > assigned
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > your physical or subinterface used for a FR PVC?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards
>> >> > > Gary
>> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > From: Narbik Kocharians
>> >> > > To: Gary Duncanson
>> >> > > Cc: Phillip Day ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:11 PM
>> >> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Use the "ip unnumbered lo0" to assign an IP address, that way you
>> >> > should
>> >> > > be
>> >> > > able to ping your own IP address.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > Had this one myself recently.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > This insight came from Scott Morris..
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 'If you are doing PPPoFR, you will never be able to ping your
>> own
>> >> > IP
>> >> > > address.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > (Unless you use unnumbered from another interface, but
>> technically
>> >> > then
>> >> > > you
>> >> > > are pinging that one!)'
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > From: "Phillip Day" < Phillip.Day@telindus.co.uk>
>> >> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:13 AM
>> >> > > Subject: PPPoFR
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Does anyone know of an obvious way I'm missing to ping your
>> >> > > local
>> >> >
>> >> > > > interface on a PPPoFR link? And in a lab is it likely you
>> would
>> >> > need
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > > be able to?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks in advance
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Phill Day
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the
>> >> > > intended
>> >> > > > recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by
>> >> > > telephone
>> >> > and
>> >> > > confirm
>> >> > > > that it has been deleted from your system and any copies
>> >> > destroyed.
>> >> > > If
>> >> > > > you
>> >> > > > are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited
>> from
>> >> > > using,
>> >> > > > printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail
>> or
>> >> > any
>> >> > > > information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavours to
>> >> > virus
>> >> > > scan
>> >> > > > all
>> >> > > > e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that
>> >> > > this
>> >> > e-mail
>> >> > > and
>> >> > > > any
>> >> > > > attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own
>> virus
>> >> > > checking.
>> >> > > > The right to monitor e-mail communications through our
>> >> > > network
>> >> > > is
>> >> > > reserved
>> >> > > > by
>> >> > > > us.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Narbik Kocharians
>> >> > > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> >> > > CCSI# 30832
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Narbik Kocharians
>> >> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> >> CCSI# 30832
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Narbik Kocharians
>> > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> > CCSI# 30832
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART