From: Mike Kraus \(mikraus\) (mikraus@cisco.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 12:16:57 ART
Yes, that is correct.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg
/swmstp.htm#wp1033176 states:
"MSTP, which uses RSTP for rapid convergence".....
________________________________
From: Ben [mailto:bmunyao@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:06 AM
To: Mike Kraus (mikraus)
Cc: ali hassan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: pvst vs mst
Did i read somewhere that MST uses RSTP on each instance, with the
associated fast convergence?
Ben
On 6/29/07, Mike Kraus (mikraus) < mikraus@cisco.com> wrote:
MST - 802.1w support for faster convergence & Industry standard.
Wouldn't even compare it against PVST anymore... However, I
would
compare it against Rapid-PVST.
Rapid-PVST - Perceived as easier to configure than MST, allows
for more
spanning-tree instances (64 is normally enough unless all of
your VLANs
have a different topology).
Bottom-line, I would say most people in an all Cisco environment
go
Rapid-PVST (or PVST). In mixed-vendor, I would do MST.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf Of
ali hassan
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: pvst vs mst
Hi folks,
i m in the middle of choosing mst over pvst in my data center
with over
100 vlan.
if anyone can suggest me with the benefits of it over pvst it
will be of
great help.
ragards ali
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake.
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART