From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 11:14:09 ART
Whether the Multicast is
1) PIM static version 1
2) PIM AutoRP version 1.5
3) PIM BSR version 2.0
The verification commands are the same.
It is still "show ip pim rp mapping" ;)
On 6/29/07, louis john <west_coast@inbox.com> wrote:
>
>
> WorkerBee
>
> You should see all of them, this is BSR not Autorp
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ciscobee@gmail.com
> > Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:02:04 +0800
> > To: west_coast@inbox.com
> > Subject: Re: How to verify the BSR Election ?
> >
> > Go to any of the PIM router and do a "show ip pim rp mapping".
> >
> > Only 1 PIMv2 RP is selected for that particular multicast group.
> >
> > On 6/29/07, louis john <west_coast@inbox.com> wrote:
> >> Ivan, thanks for replying, Now I have two questions :
> >>
> >>
> >> 1 - How do you interpret the (1) and (2) ? if I replaced the priority
> >> the following result will appear :
> >>
> >>
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
> >>
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.2.2, holdtime 119 sec priority 100
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec priority 200
> >>
> >>
> >> 2 - How can I very on any of those routers who is the preferred ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Please do not refer me to the lower priority, I want a proof via debug
> >> or show command.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ivan@iip.net
> >>> Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:34:36 +0400
> >>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com, west_coast@inbox.com
> >>> Subject: Re: How to verify the BSR Election ?
> >>>
> >>> BSR doesn't elect RP. BSR only spread information about RP across
> >>> multicast
> >>> domain. Each router decide wich RP it will be use. Lower priority more
> >>> prefer.
> >>>
> >>> On Friday 29 June 2007 17:22, louis john wrote:
> >>>> Hi Group : I have collected the following debug out of the BSR router
> >>>> ,
> >>>> please tell me if this way of verification is valid to know who was
> >>>> elected
> >>>> as RP
> >>>>
> >>>> debug ip pim bsr
> >>>>
> >>>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.175: PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
> >>>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec
> >>>> priority 100 *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.2.2,
> >>>> holdtime 119 sec priority 200
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> in the above debug, can we say R5 was elected because of two things :
> >>>> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> 1 - Lower Priority
> >>>> 2 - RP(1) is shown as the first RP in the RP-set.
> >>>>
> >>>> ____________________________________________________________
> >>>> FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends
> >>>> and
> >>>> family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART