From: louis john (west_coast@inbox.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 10:42:57 ART
Ivan, thanks for replying, Now I have two questions :
1 - How do you interpret the (1) and (2) ? if I replaced the priority the following result will appear :
PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.2.2, holdtime 119 sec priority 100
PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec priority 200
2 - How can I very on any of those routers who is the preferred ?
Please do not refer me to the lower priority, I want a proof via debug or show command.
Thanks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ivan@iip.net
> Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:34:36 +0400
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com, west_coast@inbox.com
> Subject: Re: How to verify the BSR Election ?
>
> BSR doesn't elect RP. BSR only spread information about RP across
> multicast
> domain. Each router decide wich RP it will be use. Lower priority more
> prefer.
>
> On Friday 29 June 2007 17:22, louis john wrote:
>> Hi Group : I have collected the following debug out of the BSR router ,
>> please tell me if this way of verification is valid to know who was
>> elected
>> as RP
>>
>> debug ip pim bsr
>>
>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.175: PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec
>> priority 100 *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.2.2,
>> holdtime 119 sec priority 200
>>
>>
>> in the above debug, can we say R5 was elected because of two things : ?
>>
>> 1 - Lower Priority
>> 2 - RP(1) is shown as the first RP in the RP-set.
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends
>> and
>> family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART