Re: CBWFQ and pak_priority

From: Kamal Dissanayaka (kamalasiri@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 19:57:11 ART


Hi Greg,

My understanding is pak_priority applies for locally sourced packets with
cs6, please correct me if I am wrong. As an example most of the IGP traffic
is locally generated and span only one hop. On the other hand BGP traverse
through network and you need to specially assign them to a queue.

Please have a look on bellow link.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a008022564f.html

Best Regards
Kamal

On 6/26/07, Gregory Gombas <ggombas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if you need to specify a seperate class-map for
> routing protocols.
>
> According to the following doc:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml
>
> On some platforms you need to specifically assign to a queue:
> "In other words, on the Cisco 7500 series, if an output service-policy
> is attached to the interface, then the packets are classified with
> respect to the classes in that policy, and the pak_priority packet is
> placed at the end of the chosen class queue. If the pak_priority
> packet does not match any user defined class, then it is placed at the
> tail of the class-default queue.".
>
> What is the rule of thumb regarding routing protocol QOS?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:51 ART