Re: TCP Intercept Question

From: ismail el-shalh (ishelh_mdsa@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 21:34:34 ART

• Next message: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "IPv6 fragment header purpose?"
• Previous message: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: originate default rip route only when 2 interfaces are down"
• Maybe in reply to: Antonio Soares: "TCP Intercept Question"
• Next in thread: Eric Poulin: "Re: TCP Intercept Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 I believe it is option 4.

 
   
 Ismail El-Shalh :)
MMR/MDSA

----- Original Message ----
From: Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt>
To: ccie forum <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 2:07:42 AM
Subject: TCP Intercept Question

Hello group,

Question about TCP Intercept:

Q: Consider having a web server with an IP address of 160.10.33.1 on VLAN_X
and configure R1 to intercept all TCP traffic to this server.

Which ACL would you configure?

1) access-list 101 permit tcp any any

2) access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq www

3) access-list 103 permit tcp any host 160.10.33.1

4) access-list 104 permit tcp any host 160.10.33.1 eq www

Thanks,
Antonio

• Next message: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "IPv6 fragment header purpose?"
• Previous message: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: originate default rip route only when 2 interfaces are down"
• Maybe in reply to: Antonio Soares: "TCP Intercept Question"
• Next in thread: Eric Poulin: "Re: TCP Intercept Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:51 ART