RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a

From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri May 25 2007 - 21:04:49 ART


The 2000:/3 range has been released for public usage now. That includes
from 2000:.... to 3FFF:.... addresses. If you are doing translation (4-6 OR
6-4) then technically you can use any IPv4 addresses you feel like, whether
public or private!

The range I have is out of the 2620: block by the way. :)

The recommendation of what to run really depends on the details that you are
or are not running within each of your protocol (ipv4 and ipv6). I'd be
hesitant to say there's an "always" to any of it.

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 7:56 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a
2002:.../48 bit subnet of IPv6 ?

Appreciate any help.

But 2002:.../48 can still be used by IPv4 addresses 10.*.*.* and
192.168.*.*.

So, if a site is under 10.*.*.* basic IPv4 addresses, 6to4 can still be used
in a site. But we recommend ISATAP for single site ?

On the other hand, if 2 border routers run ISATAP, we don't recommand ISATAP
in between sites because we have NAT or BGP or some compatibility issues
with ISATAP?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART