Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a

From: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Date: Fri May 25 2007 - 20:56:16 ART

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Previous message: laidlaw@consecro.com: "minimal ospf database in area 0."
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Maybe reply: John Gibson: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Appreciate any help.

But 2002:.../48 can still be used by IPv4 addresses 10.*.*.* and 192.168.*.*.

So, if a site is under 10.*.*.* basic IPv4 addresses, 6to4 can still be used
in a site. But we recommend ISATAP for single site ?

On the other hand, if 2 border routers run ISATAP, we don't recommand
ISATAP in between sites because we have NAT or BGP or some compatibility
issues with ISATAP?

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Previous message: laidlaw@consecro.com: "minimal ospf database in area 0."
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Maybe reply: John Gibson: "RE: Every officially assigned IP address is considered given a"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART