Re: Multicast routing over a Non Multicast network

From: nisha rani (nisharani1@googlemail.com)
Date: Tue May 22 2007 - 14:31:36 ART

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Who said the 4th time isn't a charm?"
• Previous message: sam s: "Re: Multicast routing over a Non Multicast network"
• Maybe in reply to: Graham Clarke: "Multicast routing over a Non Multicast network"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yeah I meant Ip multicast helper-map command.

On 22/05/07, nisha rani <nisharani1@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you try using ip multicast helper address command?
>
> On 22/05/07, Graham Clarke <graham@cisco-engineer.com> wrote:
> >
> > Group,
> >
> > Is there a way to use multicast across a WAN where some of the wan
> > components dont support multicast routing, WITHOUT using Tunneling
> > mechanisms?
> >
> > Multicast server ----- X (multicast) ------ (fluffy cloud (no
> > multicast))
> > -------- X (multicast enabled) ----- Clients
> >
> > My thoughts were convert the multicast to a Unicast, but I couldnt find
> > any
> > helpfull docs around this, and Cisco's reccomended solution is by using
> > GRE
> > Tunneling, which is not allowed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> >
> > Graham Clarke
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Who said the 4th time isn't a charm?"
• Previous message: sam s: "Re: Multicast routing over a Non Multicast network"
• Maybe in reply to: Graham Clarke: "Multicast routing over a Non Multicast network"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART