From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu May 17 2007 - 09:29:40 ART
Brian,
Are you saying that the ip ospf flood reduction knob
does solve this problem or not? I'm thinking it does,
but please correct me if I mistake its usage.
It sounded like you said it doesn't really meet the
requirements, then you in your answer (that does???)
meet the requirements the only word difference is "can
not flood..." and "should not be sent..."
I would think the command fits. Especially since it is
probably a translation from another language and may
not be exactly 100% explicit.
Let me know if I'm misunderstanding something here.
Thanks
Darby
--- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
wrote:
> The OSPF flood reduction feature doesn't really meet
> the requirements. The
> question could be worded: "external routes from the
> ASBR should not be sent
> into this particular area"
>
> --
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>
>
> On 5/15/07 5:37 PM, "iyux2000@gmail.com"
> <iyux2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, group
> > Here is the scenario, i configured an OSPF
> area with NSSA feature enabled,
> > but the requirement says "external routes from
> ASBR can not flood in this
> > particular area", what does that mean? what's your
> response? My answer is to
> > configure "ip ospf flood-reduction" in this area?
> Is that correct?
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART