From: Roberto Fernandez (rofernandez@tracfone.com)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 17:19:08 ART
Well I don't think that's the problem because below you have a similar
scenario, where both summaries are advertised. The second one does not
suppress the first on this case.
area 0 range 10.150.190.0 255.255.254.0
area 0 range 10.150.128.0 255.255.192.0 cost 1000
Roberto Fernandez
Sr. Consultant, CCIE# 17150
Insight Enterprises, Inc
Cell +1 (786) 564 - 3289
Office +1 (305) 715 - 6537
-----Original Message-----
From: Leon van Dongen [mailto:l.dongen1@chello.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:12 PM
To: Roberto Fernandez
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Summarization at area border
Hi Roberto,
Line 2 is summarizing networks 10.150.0.0 - 10.150.127.255. That
includes network 10.150.12.168/31.
My best shot at it would be that the more specific summary gets
suppressed due to the existence of the 10.150.0.0/17 summary.
HTH
Leon
Roberto Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I'm having an issue, playing with the "area range" command and here is
> the thing:
>
> router ospf 1
>
> area 0 range 10.150.12.168 255.255.255.254 cost 1000 area 0 range
> 10.150.0.0 255.255.128.0 area 0 range 10.150.190.0 255.255.254.0
> area 0 range 10.150.128.0 255.255.192.0 cost 1000 area 0 range
> 10.150.192.0 255.255.248.0 area 0 range 10.150.200.0 255.255.255.0
> area 0 range 10.150.224.0 255.255.224.0 cost 1000
>
>
> When I verify the summaries being advertised to the other areas I see
> all summaries with their corresponding costs, except for the first
> summary. Any idea or any restriction applies?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Roberto Fernandez
> CCIE# 17150
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART