From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 16:10:51 ART
All that you need to use is the 'no frame inverse' command.
On 5/15/07, Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com <Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com> wrote:
>
> I'm kind of getting the impression here that if we're asked to disable
> automatic l2-l3 frame-relay mapping methods that we should now issue a 'no
> arp frame-relay' in addition to 'no frame inv'. Should be safe, right?
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>
> "Sergio Silva" <spmsilva@gmail.com>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 05/15/2007 01:23 PM
> Please respond to
> "Sergio Silva" <spmsilva@gmail.com>
>
>
> To
> "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> cc
> "Cisco Key" <ciscokey@googlemail.com>, "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject
> Re: ARP Frame relay
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Brian
>
> Its just its documented in practical studies as per the following
>
> Router(config-if)no frame-relay inverse-arp Disables the sending of
> Inverse ARP requests. Use this command in conjunction with no arp
> frame-relay to prevent the dynamic mapping of PVCs. Router(config-if)no
> arp
> frame-relay Disables ARP responses. Use this in conjunction with the no
> frame-relay inverse-arp command.
>
> So I just needed clarity on this
>
> thank
> p
>
>
>
> On 15/05/07, Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> >
> > The "no arp frame-relay" command does not stop the router from sending
> > inverse-ARP requests or replying to inverse-ARP requests. The command
> > does
> > not have any effect on inverse-ARP whatsoever. If you think about it
> > there
> > isn't support for ARP in Frame Relay to begin with so why would you ever
> > need to disable it? Frame Relay supports inverse-ARP but not ARP.
> >
> > Inverse Address Resolution Protocol
> > http://www.internetworkexpert.com/rfc/rfc1293.txt
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
> > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/07 5:29 AM, "Cisco Key" <ciscokey@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Group
> > >
> > > I do apologise if this question has been asked a million times before,
> > but I
> > > have been searching the archives and have still not found any
> definitive
> > > answer on the use/uselessness of ARP Frame-relay,
> > >
> > > I have found the following:
> > >
> > > ARP Frame-relay no arp frame-relay" also to circumvent sending out
> ip
> > > address to DLCI binding information no arp frame-relay that this will
> > kill
> > > auto install Router(config-if)no frame-relay inverse-arp Disables
> the
> > > sending of Inverse ARP requests. Use this command in conjunction with
> > no
> > > arp frame-relay to prevent the dynamic mapping of
> > PVCs. Router(config-if)no
> > > arp frame-relay Disables ARP responses. Use this in conjunction
> with
> > the
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp command.
> > >
> > > Is this command really needed, I know this use to be used with ATM,
> but
> > I do
> > > not really see the use of this command if no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > does
> > > the job
> > >
> > > Please comment
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART