From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 09:03:59 ART
got my own post and found a typo :-), /18 for sure
sorry
on 5/15/2007 11:16 AM Alexei Monastyrnyi wrote:
> seems to be right
>
> this is more of basic VLSM math, approach is the same
>
> your subnets are crossing bit boundaries for any supernet prefix less
> than 144.22.0.0/19, this one is the most specific prefix for those
> three in question
>
> HTH
> A.
>
> on 5/15/2007 10:39 AM To Be CCIE wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry to ask such a basic question. I'm a little stuck at the moment trying
>> to figure out what will be the summary route for the following in OSPF:
>>
>> I have these three addresses:
>>
>> 144.22.22.1/24
>> 144.22.32.1/24
>> 144.22.47.1/24
>>
>> I have done some trial and errors and figure out that the following will
>> work for summarizing them:
>>
>> area 0 range 144.22.0.0 255.255.192.0
>>
>> Can someone verify this and let me know if there is a quick way
>> to figure this out?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART