From: Roman Rodichev (roman@iementor.com)
Date: Sat May 12 2007 - 11:27:54 ART
From the information you gave, I don't see any reason why that network would
be missing. Please provide more topology info and paste OSPF config on R3
and RIP config on R6.
Roman Rodichev
5xCCIE #7927 (R&S, Security, Voice, Storage, Service Provider)
Instructor, Content Developer. ieMentor Corporation
http://www.iementor.com
Y!M: roman7927
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
NITIN
> NITIN
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 9:56 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: REDISTRIBUTE--------OSPF to RIP
>
> Hi Group,
> I'm facing a issue while redistributing OSPF to RIP
>
> (141.1.0.0/24 OSPF NETWORK)R2-----OSPF PROTOCOL (141.1.123.0/24)-----R3---
> (141.1.36.0)(RIP PROTOCOL) ----R6
>
> Rack1R3#sh ip route ospf
> 51.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 51.51.51.51 [110/20] via 141.1.123.1, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O E2 204.12.1.0/24 [110/100] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> 141.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 13 subnets
> O IA 141.1.145.0 [110/11185] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.255.0 [110/84] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.8.0 [110/84] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.0.0 [110/74] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53,
> Serial2/0.1<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<I HAVE THIS N/W on R3
> O 141.1.25.0 [110/11175] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.45.0 [110/11239] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.54.0 [110/11185] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
> O IA 141.1.88.0 [110/84] via 141.1.123.2, 00:02:53, Serial2/0.1
>
> Rack1R3#sh ip route 141.1.0.0 255.255.255.0
> Routing entry for 141.1.0.0/24
> Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 74, type inter area
> Redistributing via rip
> Advertised by rip metric 2
> Last update from 141.1.123.2 on Serial2/0.1, 00:04:55 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 141.1.123.2, from 150.1.2.2, 00:04:55 ago, via Serial2/0.1
> Route metric is 74, traffic share count is 1
>
>
> BUT R3 I REDISTRIBUTE OSPF TO RIP -------
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 2
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface Ethernet0/0
> no passive-interface Ethernet1/0
> network 141.1.0.0<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> no auto-summary
> !
>
> Rack1R6#sh ip route 141.1.0.0
> Routing entry for 141.1.0.0/24, 12 known subnets
> Attached (1 connections)
> Redistributing via rip
> R 141.1.145.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.255.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.8.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.7.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.25.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.45.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> C 141.1.36.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.37.0 [120/1] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.54.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.77.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.88.0 [120/2] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> R 141.1.123.0 [120/1] via 141.1.36.3, 00:00:18, Ethernet0/0
> Rack1R6#sh ip route 141.1.0.0 255.255.255.0
> % Subnet not in table
>
> BUT R6 doesn't have the specific N/W 141.1.0.0/24
> Please suggest why such behaviour.
> Please do let me know if the info provided BY ME IS NOT SUFFICIENT AND
WHAT
> ELSE REQUIRED.
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART