From: Jeff Mullan (jmullan78@gmail.com)
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 00:59:22 ART
I would go ahead and use the ip ospf mtu ignore. But thats just me :)
Frankly, until unless the task says one way or the other, I think we are
free to do what ever we want.
On 5/7/07, Cagri Yucel <cyucel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can I extend the question a bit Jeff, if you don't mind ?
> My bit is, if we have mtu mismatch preventing OSPF adjecency what is the
> best practice ? Using ip mtu to set one end matching the other or use ip
> ospf mtu-ignore ?
>
> Cagri
>
>
> On 5/6/07, Jeff Mullan <jmullan78@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> > If in the exam we find out that there is no task related to the dot1
> > tunnel,
> > and the CAT system MTUs are set at 1504 or so, shall we go ahead and
> > change
> > them and reload the switches or, we use ip opsf mtu ignore for routing
> > purposes ? Any thoughts, best practice here ?
> > Thanks,
> > -JM
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -cagri
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART