RE: EIGRP question interpretation

From: CCIE 19999 (ccie@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 20:26:18 ART

• Next message: Brad Ellis: "Re: OT Colleges that teach Cisco curriculum at the CCIE Level"
• Previous message: WorkerBee: "OSPF LSA Type after Area Range and Summary Address"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIE 19999: "EIGRP question interpretation"
• Next in thread: F. Sanchez Vega: "Re: EIGRP question interpretation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

A third reading of the task, especially the end of it says "... in 12
seconds." made me think in the right direction.

Thanks for your input.
Shine

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE
19999
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 7:22 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP question interpretation

Hi,

I am working on a lab workbook with the following question:

"In order to help the network converge faster in the event of the frame
relay link failing, configure R3 and R5 to declare their neighbor
relationship dead if they have not received an EIGRP hello in 12 seconds."

There are no other references to this task anywhereelse. My instinct says,
you need to configure the EIGRP hello interval to 12 seconds. But the
solution in the workbook says, dead interval of 12 sec or hello interval of
4 sec.

I am wondering how you people will interpret this question.

Thanks in advance.

Shine

• Next message: Brad Ellis: "Re: OT Colleges that teach Cisco curriculum at the CCIE Level"
• Previous message: WorkerBee: "OSPF LSA Type after Area Range and Summary Address"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIE 19999: "EIGRP question interpretation"
• Next in thread: F. Sanchez Vega: "Re: EIGRP question interpretation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:37 ART