From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2007 - 02:32:17 ART
Have you seen www.ccxx.net they have some interesting
lab hardware configurations and seem to have a vibrant
community.
http://www.ccxx.net/lab.htm - see for yourself.
With some 13 or so CCIE's as their instructors it is
no wonder they are so vibrant.
http://www.ciscoedu.com/ccie.asp
And Chinese is not one of the languages I speak some
of...
But this is quite a list from here:
L)?KQ'T13I9&>MR5SZCISCO#,;(FlRxPP5HC{Fs#!
07Dj4TB9HUO21(#,A=8vM,C{M,PU5Dliming11>)K+K+R;4NM(9}R&S
CCI#,W#:XK{CGA=8v#!
07Dj4TBO21(,2HULiufeng11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,27HUYinjunjie11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,26HUchenduan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,jiangtmK<?F2i7V3I9&#,R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,22HUlibin11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,9HUwugang11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,8HULiuyun11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,6HUwangguan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBO21(,5HUJiangzhenzhong11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj2TBO21(,9HUSongsuqi11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj2TBO21(,5HUWangjifeng11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj 2TBO21(,1HUYuyan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
06Dj 10TBO21(,30HUchenjian11>)M(9}R&S CCIE !
06Dj 10TBO21(,27HUwangweixiangO$DaR;4NPASS CCIE !
06Dj 10TBO21(,19HU,lilei11>)M(9}R&S CCIE !
06Dj 10TBO21(,12HU,zhoujie11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE !
06Dj 9TBO21(,28HU,chenbin11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE !
06Dj 9TBO21(,22HU,shiyufeiC@9zR;4NM(9}R&S CCIE !
06Dj 9TBO21(,20HU,Huangwenyi11>)M(9}Security CCIE !
06Dj 8TBO21(,10HU,Zengxincao11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 8TBO21(,10HU,Yuxinyu11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 8TBO21(,3HU,Zhongduanyuan11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 7TBO21(,13HU,Xupeng11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 7TBO21(,6HU,Gaoqian11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 7TBO21(,6HU,Liuqi11>)M(9}LAB!
06Dj 6TBO21(,5HU,zhangquankai11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 6TBO21(,2HU,suntao11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 6TBO21(,1HU,yuhaitao11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,30HU,SiQi11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,29HU,WuXiaoQi11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,26HU,ZhangDongPei11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,24HU,xingzhihua11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,23HU,Lizhen11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,22HUxiawei11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,18HUchengjisi11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 5TBO21(,16HUchihonglei11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 4TBO21(,24HUzhuxiaomin11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 4TBO21(,15HUSy11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 1TBO21(,18HUzhangjin11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
06Dj 1TBO21(,13HUzhangzhijun11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
11TBO21(,23HUyuqiang11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
11TBO21(,23HUccie_mygoal11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
11TBO21(,17HUbanjingxun11>)M(R;4NM(9}LAB#!
11TBO21(,9HUwangzhuntao11>)M(9}LAB#!
9TBO21(,28HUshishoulin11>)M(9}LAB#!
9TBO21(,27HUzhangjuan11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
9TB26O21(,wuying11>)M(9}LAB#!
9TBO21(,23HUwuyuan11>)R;4NPASS CCIE LAB#!
9TBO21(,21HUfujun11>)R;4NM(9}CCIE LAB
9TBO21(,15HUlike11>)pass CCIE LAB#!
9TBO21(,13HUwangqingli11>)pass LAB#!
9TBO21(,12HUjeans11>)pass,2;V*8CK5J2C4#!
9TBO21(,5HUqianjunxian11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
9TBO21(,2HUyanzhipeng11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
8TBO21(,24HUwangxiaobin11>)M(9}LAB#!
8TBO21(,23HUchenxu11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
8TBO21(,23HUzhuyongmei11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
7TBO21(,20HUqiaojian11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
7TBO21(,20HUquhua11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
7TBO21(,19HUzhuhaoOc8[R;4NM(9}LAB#!
6TBO21(,9HUwangjingru11>)R;4NM(9}LAB#!
Q'T1200S`HKH+2?R;4NM(9}CCNA/NP?<JT#!
L)?K<<JuB[L3#=WJT492Om#;<<JuL=LV#;RIDQ=b4p#!
07Dj4TB9HUA=8vM,C{M,PUlimingM,Q'11>)M,J1K+K+R;4NM(9}R&S
CCI#,W#:XK{CGA=8v#!
07Dj4TB2HULiufeng11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TB27HUYinjunjie11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TB26HUchenduan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj3TBjiangtianmin2i7V3I9&#,UR;XAKJtSZWT<:5DCCIEV$Ji#,W#:XK{3TB2HUR;4NPASS
CCIE#!
07Dj3TB22HULibin11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj3TB9HUwugang11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj3TB8HULiuyun11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj3TB6HUwangguan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj3TB5HUjiangzhenzhong11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj2TB9HUSongsuqi11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
07Dj2TB5HUwangjifeng11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE
07Dj2TB1HUYuYan11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
06Dj11TB3HUyinrong11>)R;4NM(9}R&S CCIE#!
06Dj10TB30HUchenjian11>)M(9}R&S CCIE#!
06Dj10TB27HUwangweixiangO$DaR;4NPASS CCIE#!
06Dj10TB19HU,lilei11>)PASS R&S CCIE
06Dj10TB12HU,zhoujie11>)R;4NPASS R&S CCIE
06Dj9TB28HU,chenbin11>)R;4NPASS R&S CCIE #!
06Dj9TB22HU,P!J7TZC@9zR;4NPASS R&S CCIE #!
06Dj9TB20HU,Huangwenyi11>)PASS Security CCIE#!
8TBU=1(:2006Dj8TB10HU,ZhengxincaoOc8[R;4NM(9}LAB!
8TBU=1(:2006Dj8TB10HU,Yuxinyu11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
8TBU=1(:2006Dj8TB3HU,Zhongdunyuan11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
7TBU=1(:2006Dj7TB13HU,Xupeng11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
7TBU=1(:2006Dj7TB6HU,Gaoqian11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
7TBU=1(:2006Dj7TB6HU,Liuqi11>)M(9}LAB!!
6TBU=1(:2006Dj6TB5HU,Zhangquankai11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!
6TBU=1(:2006Dj6TB2HU,Suntao11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!!
6TBU=1(:2006Dj6TB1HU,Yuhaitao11>)R;4NM(9}LAB!!
5TBU=1(:2006Dj5TB,L)?KA,Px8HKR;4NPASS CCIE LAB !
==========================
http://tire.patch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ccie
--- Muhabat <muhabat@gmail.com> wrote:
> So my original answer is still there... where are
> the other planets in solar
> system? I am member of all what I can find in
> English and few Chinese sits
> also :) although I don't understand Chinese but IOS
> is quite Universal
> language these days.
> If some one can list some other good lists/resource
> will be a pleaser to
> many.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Robert Hosford
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:04 AM
> To: Martin Kiefer; Darby Weaver
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> I lurked for years.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Martin Kiefer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 5:34 PM
> To: 'Darby Weaver'
> Cc: 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> Hi.
>
> I think that a lot more people are reading the GS
> than there are people
> writing. At both of mine attempts I heard people
> talking about posts on GS.
>
> Especially at my first attempt I had some fun
> listening to a couple of guys
> talking about that they had seen a rumor on GS that
> you should only have 70%
> to pass after they introduced the new R&S lab ;-)
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Darby Weaver
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:07 PM
> > To: Scott Morris; 'Dusty'; 'Marvin Greenlee';
> 'CCIE 19999'; 'Muhabat';
> > 'Bill Mckenzie'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> >
> > I can say the same many of the people I took the
> lab
> > with didn't use GS either.
> >
> > John Gibson and Duncan M. went on the same days as
> I
> > last year but aside from them it was kind of
> lonely
> > from a GS point of view.
> >
> >
> > --- Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If you believe anyone is violating NDA, perhaps
> you
> > > should report them to
> > > Cisco. Unknown violations can't exactly be
> > > punished.
> > >
> > > But there is quite a history of people being
> > > stripped (permanent "inactive"
> > > status) of their CCIE. Including a training
> partner
> > > not too long ago where
> > > a quad CCIE now has none.
> > >
> > > But that's because they were discovered somehow,
> or
> > > someone alerted them.
> > > So if you see things like this happen certainly
> > > don't tell us, tell Cisco!
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott Morris, CCIE4
> (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> > > Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> > > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > > http://www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Dusty
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:21 PM
> > > To: 'Marvin Greenlee'; 'CCIE 19999'; 'Muhabat';
> > > 'Bill Mckenzie';
> > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> > >
> > > Stripping CCIE because of breaking Cisco NDA???
> What
> > > is that??? I don't
> > > think Cisco strip any CCIE because of NDA. I
> know
> > > CyscoExpert in Chicago has
> > > been breaking DNA to every student and continue
> > > breaking but they are still
> > > in business and their CCIE status still active.
> > > Cisco employee still goes
> > > there for training.
> > > I know the Cisco AVVID TAC engineer teaching at
> > > Cisco academy for part-time
> > > breaking NDA and even gives his student the
> answer
> > > for the test, his CCIE is
> > > still active and he is still working for both
> Cisco
> > > and Cisco academy...go
> > > figure! Dusty - Former Cisco employee
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Marvin Greenlee
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:45 PM
> > > To: 'CCIE 19999'; 'Muhabat'; 'Bill Mckenzie';
> > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> > >
> > > Sometimes people let them lapse, and don't
> > > recertify. The number is "active
> > > CCIEs".
> > >
> > > Also, sometimes people get their CCIE(s)
> stripped
> > > for NDA violations, etc.
> > >
> > > Also, the count didn't start at 0. Started at
> 1025,
> > > I think?
> > >
> > > Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
> Senior
> > > Technical Instructor -
> > > IPexpert, Inc.
> > > "When Will You Be an IP Expert?"
> > > marvin@ipexpert.com
> > > http://www.IPexpert.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE
> > > 19999
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:34 PM
> > > To: 'Muhabat'; 'Bill Mckenzie';
> > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> > >
> > > This poses another question. The total number of
> > > CCIEs as of 04.2.2007 is
> > > 14387
> > >
> >
>
(http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/certified_ccies/worldwide.h
> > tml#t
> > > op). The last number reported in GS is 17781.
> Why is
> > > this difference?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > RS
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Muhabat
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:31 PM
> > > To: 'Bill Mckenzie'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> > >
> > > So this brings another interesting question.
> Where
> > > are the other study
> > > mailing lists as comprehensive as this? I don't
> mind
> > > even to learn an-other
> > > language for this :)
> > > BTW: IOS command line is also like a foreign
> > > language.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bill Mckenzie
> [mailto:bmckenzie@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 4:07 PM
> > > To: muhabat@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
> > >
> > > Muhabat,
> > > When I attended the lab (multiple times), during
> > > lunch I would bring up
> > > groupstudy and MOST of the people that were
> there
> > > taking the lab with me
> > > weren't a part of the list. This was just my
> > > experience but I thought it was
> > >
> > > very interesting.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Mckenzie, CCIE#16725, CCVP
> > > Systems Engineer
> > > Cisco Systems, Inc.
> > > Phone: 614-425-2370
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Muhabat"
> > > >Reply-To: "Muhabat"
> > > >To:
> > > >Subject: where are the missing Numbers.
> > > >Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:58:31 +0300
> > > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > >Received: from lists.groupstudy.com
> > > ([207.44.210.9]) by
> > > >bay0-mc9-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
> > > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
> > > >Wed, 18
> > >
> > > >Apr 2007 05:56:58 -0700
> > > >Received: (from sympa@localhost)by
> > > lists.groupstudy.com
> > > >(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id
> l3ICuuet000777;Wed, 18
> > > Apr 2007 08:56:56
> > > >-0400
> > > >Received: from groupstudy.com
> (www.groupstudy.com
> > > [209.51.144.7])by
> > > >lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6)
> with
> > > ESMTP id
> > > >l3ICunOI000735for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007
> > > >08:56:49
> > >
> > > >-0400
> > > >Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com
> > > [127.0.0.1])by
> > > >groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
> > > l3ICuolD009149GroupStudy
> > > >Mailer; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:50 -0400
> > > >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by
> > > groupstudy.com
> > > >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id
> > > l3ICuok8009147for ccielabxhiddenx;
> > > >Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:50 -0400
> > > >Received: from an-out-0708.google.com
> > > (an-out-0708.google.com
> > > >[209.85.132.240]) by groupstudy.com
> > > (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
> > > >ESMTP id l3ICulWC009126 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed,
> 18
> > > Apr 2007 08:56:47
> > > >-0400
> > > >Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP
> id
> > > b6so223025ana for ;
> > > >Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
> > > >Received: by 10.100.57.14 with SMTP id
> > > f14mr304679ana.1176901006189;
> > > >Wed,
> > > >18 Apr 2007 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
> > > >Received: from Nadeem ( [217.145.245.138]) by
> > > mx.google.com with ESMTP
> > > >id c29sm898864anc.2007.04.18.05.56.44; Wed, 18
> Apr
> > > 2007 05:56:45 -0700
> > > >(PDT)
> > > >X-Message-Info:
> > >
> >
>
>LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlK3i2JRbWv+52yK6CufkKEzC8qQ+Ah0abc
> > > >DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> > > d=gmail.com; s=beta;
> > >
> >
>
>h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:mime-
> > versi
> > > >on:c
> > >
> >
>
ontent-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id;
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>b=kYv861yPsLxGSq2c5Fv8bbV1k0xd0D8Hbwn+sHPCJRVsEs6prRMwSnMi/bVbsnMxk8TQ
> > w
> > > >PevC
> > >
> >
>
0oNj3Q7ZL68Zh4mYSWI5I5l4049Ya7Qaes8KyfPSQ48maNb0jXZt6WJwgjjTbbvSb0Z+21m
> > /
> > >
> >
>
0oNj3Q7ZL68Zh4mYSWI5I5l4049Ya7Qaes8KyfPSQ48maNb0jXZt6WJwgjjTbbvSb0Z+Y/Z
> > 7
> > > WHi48NO6SdfccdKHXlcWvU=
> > > >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
> > > d=gmail.com; s=beta;
> > >
> >
>
>h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-
> > mailer:thre
> > > >ad-i
> > > ndex:x-mimeole:message-id;
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>b=VrBFpWiJbDsNBDjft3uZRQM7WqaLywIgVT5txTyGLMQ4T5tjAAN96PfAfP+Drhah18pz
> > l
> > > >GzQU
> > >
> >
>
MER/bMQDVoiq+ezQPam2Wb7rrgIAL25zy/wUKp8ptBC33qb98GdGFXvAV29VZHkdlXYLMPL
> > +lXGh
> > > dwS+5SGnLJ0LiM2cu39AbA=
> > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build
> 11.0.5510
> > > >Thread-Index: AceBuUPV5n2r1bxPTd+rBVHbYAJo1A==
> > > >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from
> > > multipart/alternative by GroupStudy
> > > >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section
> used
> > > was text/plain
> > > >X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from
> > > muhabat@gmail\.com] (2007/04/18
> > > >08:56:50)
> > > >X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >X-Sequence: 12454
> > > >Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> > > >Precedence: bulk
> > > >X-no-archive: yes
> > > >List-Id:
> > > >List-Help:
> > > >List-Subscribe:
> > > >
> > > >List-Unsubscribe:
> > > >
> > > >List-Post:
> > > >List-Owner:
> > > >Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2007
> 12:56:58.0199
> > > (UTC)
> > > >FILETIME=[0C7FE670:01C781B9]
> > > >
> > > >Hi GS,
> > > >
> > > >Just out of curiosity, one of members reported
> > > 17774 and second one 17781.
> > > >Where are those missing numbers? Actually these
> are
> > > 7 numbers. And it
> > > >looks very difficult that some on passed ccie
> > > without being part of
> > > >this mailing list.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Best Regards,
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:36 ART