From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2007 - 18:06:55 ART
I can say the same many of the people I took the lab
with didn't use GS either.
John Gibson and Duncan M. went on the same days as I
last year but aside from them it was kind of lonely
from a GS point of view.
--- Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> If you believe anyone is violating NDA, perhaps you
> should report them to
> Cisco. Unknown violations can't exactly be
> punished.
>
> But there is quite a history of people being
> stripped (permanent "inactive"
> status) of their CCIE. Including a training partner
> not too long ago where
> a quad CCIE now has none.
>
> But that's because they were discovered somehow, or
> someone alerted them.
> So if you see things like this happen certainly
> don't tell us, tell Cisco!
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Dusty
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:21 PM
> To: 'Marvin Greenlee'; 'CCIE 19999'; 'Muhabat';
> 'Bill Mckenzie';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> Stripping CCIE because of breaking Cisco NDA??? What
> is that??? I don't
> think Cisco strip any CCIE because of NDA. I know
> CyscoExpert in Chicago has
> been breaking DNA to every student and continue
> breaking but they are still
> in business and their CCIE status still active.
> Cisco employee still goes
> there for training.
> I know the Cisco AVVID TAC engineer teaching at
> Cisco academy for part-time
> breaking NDA and even gives his student the answer
> for the test, his CCIE is
> still active and he is still working for both Cisco
> and Cisco academy...go
> figure! Dusty - Former Cisco employee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Marvin Greenlee
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: 'CCIE 19999'; 'Muhabat'; 'Bill Mckenzie';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> Sometimes people let them lapse, and don't
> recertify. The number is "active
> CCIEs".
>
> Also, sometimes people get their CCIE(s) stripped
> for NDA violations, etc.
>
> Also, the count didn't start at 0. Started at 1025,
> I think?
>
> Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) Senior
> Technical Instructor -
> IPexpert, Inc.
> "When Will You Be an IP Expert?"
> marvin@ipexpert.com
> http://www.IPexpert.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE
> 19999
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:34 PM
> To: 'Muhabat'; 'Bill Mckenzie';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> This poses another question. The total number of
> CCIEs as of 04.2.2007 is
> 14387
>
(http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/certified_ccies/worldwide.html#t
> op). The last number reported in GS is 17781. Why is
> this difference?
>
> Regards,
> RS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Muhabat
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:31 PM
> To: 'Bill Mckenzie'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> So this brings another interesting question. Where
> are the other study
> mailing lists as comprehensive as this? I don't mind
> even to learn an-other
> language for this :)
> BTW: IOS command line is also like a foreign
> language.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Mckenzie [mailto:bmckenzie@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 4:07 PM
> To: muhabat@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: where are the missing Numbers.
>
> Muhabat,
> When I attended the lab (multiple times), during
> lunch I would bring up
> groupstudy and MOST of the people that were there
> taking the lab with me
> weren't a part of the list. This was just my
> experience but I thought it was
>
> very interesting.
>
>
>
> Bill Mckenzie, CCIE#16725, CCVP
> Systems Engineer
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Phone: 614-425-2370
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Muhabat"
> >Reply-To: "Muhabat"
> >To:
> >Subject: where are the missing Numbers.
> >Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:58:31 +0300
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from lists.groupstudy.com
> ([207.44.210.9]) by
> >bay0-mc9-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
> SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
> >Wed, 18
>
> >Apr 2007 05:56:58 -0700
> >Received: (from sympa@localhost)by
> lists.groupstudy.com
> >(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id l3ICuuet000777;Wed, 18
> Apr 2007 08:56:56
> >-0400
> >Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com
> [209.51.144.7])by
> >lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with
> ESMTP id
> >l3ICunOI000735for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007
> >08:56:49
>
> >-0400
> >Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com
> [127.0.0.1])by
> >groupstudy.com
>
> >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
> l3ICuolD009149GroupStudy
> >Mailer; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:50 -0400
> >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by
> groupstudy.com
> >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id
> l3ICuok8009147for ccielabxhiddenx;
> >Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:50 -0400
> >Received: from an-out-0708.google.com
> (an-out-0708.google.com
> >[209.85.132.240]) by groupstudy.com
> (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
> >ESMTP id l3ICulWC009126 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 18
> Apr 2007 08:56:47
> >-0400
> >Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id
> b6so223025ana for ;
> >Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: by 10.100.57.14 with SMTP id
> f14mr304679ana.1176901006189;
> >Wed,
> >18 Apr 2007 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from Nadeem ( [217.145.245.138]) by
> mx.google.com with ESMTP
> >id c29sm898864anc.2007.04.18.05.56.44; Wed, 18 Apr
> 2007 05:56:45 -0700
> >(PDT)
> >X-Message-Info:
>
>LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlK3i2JRbWv+52yK6CufkKEzC8qQ+Ah0abc
> >DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=gmail.com; s=beta;
>
>h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:mime-versi
> >on:c
>
ontent-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id;
>
> >
>
>b=kYv861yPsLxGSq2c5Fv8bbV1k0xd0D8Hbwn+sHPCJRVsEs6prRMwSnMi/bVbsnMxk8TQw
> >PevC
>
0oNj3Q7ZL68Zh4mYSWI5I5l4049Ya7Qaes8KyfPSQ48maNb0jXZt6WJwgjjTbbvSb0Z+21m/
>
0oNj3Q7ZL68Zh4mYSWI5I5l4049Ya7Qaes8KyfPSQ48maNb0jXZt6WJwgjjTbbvSb0Z+Y/Z7
> WHi48NO6SdfccdKHXlcWvU=
> >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
> d=gmail.com; s=beta;
>
>h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thre
> >ad-i
> ndex:x-mimeole:message-id;
> >
>
>b=VrBFpWiJbDsNBDjft3uZRQM7WqaLywIgVT5txTyGLMQ4T5tjAAN96PfAfP+Drhah18pzl
> >GzQU
>
MER/bMQDVoiq+ezQPam2Wb7rrgIAL25zy/wUKp8ptBC33qb98GdGFXvAV29VZHkdlXYLMPL+lXGh
> dwS+5SGnLJ0LiM2cu39AbA=
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
> >Thread-Index: AceBuUPV5n2r1bxPTd+rBVHbYAJo1A==
> >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from
> multipart/alternative by GroupStudy
> >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used
> was text/plain
> >X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from
> muhabat@gmail\.com] (2007/04/18
> >08:56:50)
> >X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >X-Sequence: 12454
> >Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >Precedence: bulk
> >X-no-archive: yes
> >List-Id:
> >List-Help:
> >List-Subscribe:
> >
> >List-Unsubscribe:
> >
> >List-Post:
> >List-Owner:
> >Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2007 12:56:58.0199
> (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[0C7FE670:01C781B9]
> >
> >Hi GS,
> >
> >Just out of curiosity, one of members reported
> 17774 and second one 17781.
> >Where are those missing numbers? Actually these are
> 7 numbers. And it
> >looks very difficult that some on passed ccie
> without being part of
> >this mailing list.
> >
> >
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:36 ART