From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sun Apr 08 2007 - 01:06:24 ART
They are not both the same. The effect of both MAY be the same, but it
depends on the specifics of your scenario!
Take a look at the order in which spanning tree makes it's decision for the
root port and designated port elections. Each of those criteria listed are
in order. (e.g. if there is a tie in one, it moves down to the next) If
there is NOT a tie in one of those items, then a "winner" is selected.
Cost comes first.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tandou Mohamed
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 11:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Spanning-Tree
Hello GS,
can someone explain to me when to use spanning-tree port-priority over
spanning-tree cost or vice versa? i read the cisco DoC looks like both have
same meaning may be i am wrong.
thanks,
Mohamed
---------------------------------
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:35 ART