From: Huang Laurence (huangyinxiao@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 20 2007 - 07:46:15 ART
Thanks Ivan.
You make me more clear on these.
If you configure below, it can reduce the updates. That's right.
router rip
pass def
neig x.x.x.x
But do I still need enable "rip trigged"? It can also help to minimise the
rip updates.
Thanks again.
Laurence
On 20/03/07, Ivan <ivan@iip.net> wrote:
>
> You can easily check this by debugging rip. You need to achieve consistncy
> FIB
> with less update packets (including Lo's)
>
> Pay attention on update to Loopback interfaces. Such as question state
> minimize update traffic on _ROUTER_
>
> router rip
> pass def
> neig x.x.x.x
>
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 01:48, huangyinxiao@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I confuse on the question that "how to minimise the RIP's update traffic
> on
> > one of RIP routers(R2)?" when I am doing the lab execises. What does
> this
> > question real mean? I have four solutions described as following, and I
> > don't know which answers is correct.
> >
> > 1. passive interface need to be configured
> > 2. rip trigged need to be configured
> > 3. neighbor command to transfer to unicast
> > 4. summary
> >
> > what answers can be meet the reqirement? Or anyother understandings
> about
> > the question?
> >
> > Thanks for your any reply!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurence
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:52 ART