From: Brad Ellis (brad@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2007 - 10:36:55 ART
Patrick,
We have a very nice recommended approach for R&S preparation. Feel free and
read it: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/collateral/rs-approach.pdf
The approach utilizes two different sets of workbooks we offer. One is a
technology focused approach while the other is a set of complex integrated
lab scenarios.
Scott/Zia-It appears you guys mis-read this gentleman's email (I did
originally too until an offline conversation pointed it out). He is
actually looking for R&S material, not security. ;)
thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI#30482
Network Learning Inc - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
YES! We take Cisco Learning credits!
brad@ccbootcamp.com
www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training and Advanced Technology Rental Racks)
Voice: 702-968-5100
FAX: 702-446-8012
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zia Khan" <zia.khan@yahoo.com>
To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>; "Patrick Galligan"
<Patrick.Galligan@didata.com.au>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:55 AM
Subject: RE: IPExpert vs InternetworkExpert
Hi,
I am using Khawar Butt's Security workbook,
http://www.netmetric-solutions.com/ccie_securitylabworkbooks.htm
it is good. I am new in this area, not much sure about other venders.
Thanks
Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
Hehehehe... I'm fairly sure that neither of us will be very objective!
I can say that the current Security workbook (v2) is completely different
than what you may have seen/had before. I would assume that the Brians' v2
book (when completed?) will be the same.
And as always, the "which is better" will mostly be determined by the way
the stars line up on any particular day, and what kind of mood/mode the user
happens to be in. Things work for one, and not so well for another.
If you have the ability, I would suggest getting both. Not because you'll
get any technology more in one than another (we both work from the same
blueprint), but becaues you'll get two different perspectives and methods of
thinking.
Enough about my rendition of "objective" here. ;)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Patrick Galligan
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:09 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPExpert vs InternetworkExpert
A few years I used the IPExpert to study for CCIE Security. I didn't end up
passing it and haven't attempted again for various reasons. My current job
sees me doing less security and more R&S so I want to do CCIE R&S. Can
anyone here objectively compare the workbooks from both companies? I found
the IPExpert workbook to be very good, but many people have said the same
about InternetworkExpert.
I know there are people on this list from both companies. I welcome your
comments, but obviously you will be less objective J
Cheers,
Patrick
****************************************************************************
*
*
- NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA
This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally
privileged information. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it immediately.
Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any
attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for
any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any
attachments.
****************************************************************************
*
*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART