From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2007 - 18:00:36 ART
Could you explain why you would use no-export when the requirement
states any peers.
On 3/13/07, Huizinga, Rene <rhuizinga@upcbroadband.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
> A matter of interpretation. When reading litteraly, 'any peer' ->
> no-advertise ! Probably what they're looking for as well. Normally and
> probably more practically, no-export would be used...
>
> My 2c.
>
> Cya
>
> Rene.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Jeff
> Mullan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:23 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: BGP : community no-advertise Vs no-export
>
> Folks,
> If I have a scenario like this :
>
> R1--R2--R3
>
> R1 AS 100
> R2 AS 200
> R3 AS 300
>
> R1s loopback say, 1.1.1.1/24 is being advertised via BGP to R2. If the
> task
> says " make sure R2 doesnt advertise it to any of its peer and make this
> change on R1" we will go ahead and set community to this route on R1. My
> question is, here, on R1 both no-export/no-advertise will do the trick.
> However, since there are no iBGP neigbours peering with R1, no-export will
> do the best solution. What do you guys think from exam perspective ? Will
> I
> loose points using no-advertise here ?
>
> Please note, task says " R1 should not advertise this to ANY PEER " but
> then
> we dont have any iBGP peers too .
> Thanks,
> -JM
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor) www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART