From: Huizinga, Rene (rhuizinga@upcbroadband.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2007 - 17:46:33 ART
Hi Guys,
A matter of interpretation. When reading litteraly, 'any peer' ->
no-advertise ! Probably what they're looking for as well. Normally and
probably more practically, no-export would be used...
My 2c.
Cya
Rene.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Mullan
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:23 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: BGP : community no-advertise Vs no-export
Folks,
If I have a scenario like this :
R1--R2--R3
R1 AS 100
R2 AS 200
R3 AS 300
R1s loopback say, 1.1.1.1/24 is being advertised via BGP to R2. If the task
says " make sure R2 doesnt advertise it to any of its peer and make this
change on R1" we will go ahead and set community to this route on R1. My
question is, here, on R1 both no-export/no-advertise will do the trick.
However, since there are no iBGP neigbours peering with R1, no-export will
do the best solution. What do you guys think from exam perspective ? Will I
loose points using no-advertise here ?
Please note, task says " R1 should not advertise this to ANY PEER " but then
we dont have any iBGP peers too .
Thanks,
-JM
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART