From: ian (iyux2000@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 20:57:53 ART
Edouard Zorrilla,How are you#!
Yes, i have the same question.
======= 2007-03-12 22:11:56 What you've mentioned in your letter#:=======
>Thanks Ivan,
>
>That is good one. Nevertheless I have more doubts now, for the command:
>
>Switch(config)# ip source binding 0001.1234.1234 vlan 1 172.20.50.5
>interface gigabitethernet0/1
>
>What is the real purpose of this command, to bind a ip address to a mac
>address ? It means that the host with a mac 0001.1234.1234 plug at the
>giga0/1 can just use 172.20.50.5 address ?
>
>Any repply would be appreaciate,
>
>Regards
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ivan" <ivan@iip.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <achievewoo@gmail.com>
>Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:59 AM
>Subject: Re: Port-security
>
>
>> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12235se/cr/cli1.htm#wp9079071
>>
>> On Monday 12 March 2007 11:51, achievewoo@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hi, GS
>>> To achieve switch security, We usually use "switchport port-security"
>>> command to bind layer 2 address and against untursted devices connecting
>>> switch. My question is: Is it possible to let switchport bind an stable
>>> layer 3 at the same time?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Have a nice day.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ian
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!iyux2000@gmail.com
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2007-03-13
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART