From: Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 18:36:56 ART
The network statement "network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 area 1" appears
incorrect. It could be 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 or 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0
Sean
"Jian Gu" <guxiaojian@gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
03/12/2007 11:54 AM
Please respond to
"Jian Gu" <guxiaojian@gmail.com>
To
"Tao Yang" <yangtao.mike@gmail.com>
cc
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject
Re: ospf question
This is obviously an IOS bug, R3 will have IA route to R1's loopback0 (or
loopback1?) regardless s0 on R1 is up or not.
What does ospf database show you on R1 and R2?
On 3/12/07, Tao Yang <yangtao.mike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a ospf question. The diagram is as following. The 3 router
running
> ospf.
>
> R1's configure
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
> router ospf 100
> network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 area 1
>
> If we shutdown s0 interface on R1, R3 will lost the route to R1's lo1
> interface.
> How could we advertise the lo1 route to R3.
> I have try with these 3 ways on R1, but it doesn't work.
> 1. "redistribute connected subnets"
> 2. "area 0 range 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0"
> 3. "summary-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0"
>
>
>
> lo1 area 0
> R1<------------------>R2
> s0 \ /
> \ /
> area1 \ / area2
> \ /
> R3
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART