PPP: no peer neighbor-route

From: Jeff Mullan (jmullan78@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2007 - 18:31:50 ART

• Next message: Ronnie Angello: "Re: Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Previous message: Rahmlow, Howard F.: "Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Next in thread: Paul Schuuring: "Re: PPP: no peer neighbor-route"
• Maybe reply: Paul Schuuring: "Re: PPP: no peer neighbor-route"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Folks,
In the lab exam, if we have a PPP link to be configured, AND NOTHING HAS
BEEN MENTIONED SPECIFICALLY shall we by remove the /32 via "no peer
neighbor-route" or let it stay there ? What would be a best practice here
from exam point-of-view ?
Thanks,
-JM

• Next message: Ronnie Angello: "Re: Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Previous message: Rahmlow, Howard F.: "Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Next in thread: Paul Schuuring: "Re: PPP: no peer neighbor-route"
• Maybe reply: Paul Schuuring: "Re: PPP: no peer neighbor-route"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:50 ART