From: Digital Yemeni (digital-yemeni@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 22:42:44 ART
When you redistribute connected-->EIGRP the route has AD of 170 and OSPF is
prefered since it has lower AD of 110.
That's the whole story!
Best Regards,
Digital
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***********************************************************************************
*.* You'll NEVER succeed as a "CCIE" until you LOVE Cisco MORE than your
sleep! *.*
***********************************************************************************
I've not slept for the past 5 years and I'm expected to be busy for the next
57 years + The 5 CCIEs preparation adds on that a bit. Therefore, please be
concise on your email. Thank you!
>From: "Todd, Douglas M." <DTODD@PARTNERS.ORG>
>Reply-To: "Todd, Douglas M." <DTODD@PARTNERS.ORG>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Disfunctional redistribution:
>Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:06:11 -0500
>
>Hi all:
>
>I have a problem with redistribution and I am hoping someone can help me
>understand what is going wrong.
>Basic:
>If I redistribute connected in eigrp why don't my ospf networks (which are
>the
>connected interfaces) show up in the eigrp
>table when I redistribute ospf into eigrp?
>
>To illustrate:
>
>Lets say I have a eigrp and ospf configuration of the following:
>!
>router eigrp 100
> redistribute connected metric 100000 20000 255 1 1500 route-map
>conn-eigrp
> network 136.9.23.2 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 198.9.2.2
> redistribute ospf 1
> default-metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
>!
>router ospf 1
> router-id 198.9.2.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> auto-cost reference-bandwidth 20000
> redistribute eigrp 100 metric-type 1 subnets route-map eigrp-ospf
> network 136.9.245.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 198.9.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> distance 171 198.9.1.1 0.0.0.0 1
>
>
>I see within the ospf domain my loopback of 198.9.2.2 as well as the
>136.9.245.2. Now I look too see what the eigrp topology table looks like.
>sh
>ip ei top 198.9.2.0 255.255.255.0 (since this is a /24 w/ospf network P-T-P
>under the loopback). I do not see the route. Now I remove the redistributed
>connected from the eigrp process. I do a sh ip ei top 198.9.2.0
>255.255.255.0
>and the route is there now.
>
>My question, why is eigrp blocking the redistributed route only when I have
>redistributed connected with the route-map. If I remove the route-map I
>see the
>route, but it's not coming from the ospf process, but from the
>redistributed
>process. If I remove the redist connected I see the route, but this is not
>what
>I want.
>
>The system is filtering where it shouldn't, it's filting routes coming from
>the
>ospf process AND the connected.
>
>Ideas?
>
>Douglas Todd
>Partners HealthCare, Inc.
>Network Engineering East
>Master Network Engineer
>Charlestown Navy Yard
>Building 149 (MGH East)
>13th Street
>Charlestown, MA 02129
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended
>only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
>confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
>dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this
>information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the
>Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this
>information.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART