Re: bpdugaurd feature on Glabal configuration

From: Prashant Shukla (shukla_cisco@yahoo.co.in)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 04:02:02 ART

• Next message: Darrin K. Pierce: "RE: how come custom queueing need to take into consideration of"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: replacing a prefix-list with access-list"
• Maybe in reply to: Shine: "bpdugaurd feature on Glabal configuration"
• Next in thread: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: bpdugaurd feature on Glabal configuration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey Shine,

Per my understanding, BDPU guard of the config mode works in tandem with portfast and when a portfast enabled interface receives a BPDU the port is transitioned back to the normal "non-portfast" state and goes back to listening/learning etc modes.

HTH

Shukla.
Shine <shinejoseph@iprimus.com.au> wrote: Hi GS,

Is there any advantages on enabling the bpduguard feature on a per interface
basis rather than in global configuration? Can anyone give me some lights to
it?

Thanks you,
Shine

• Next message: Darrin K. Pierce: "RE: how come custom queueing need to take into consideration of"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: replacing a prefix-list with access-list"
• Maybe in reply to: Shine: "bpdugaurd feature on Glabal configuration"
• Next in thread: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: bpdugaurd feature on Glabal configuration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART