RE: Ambiguous OSPF question...

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 17:38:53 ART


If you are told to have reachability from all routes, I would say the
important word is "specific". By that, area-range to summarize it!

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Narbik Kocharians
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:14 AM
To: Kim
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Ambiguous OSPF question...

I would say block

On 2/23/07, Kim <support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
>
> What does this mean to you? "Area 246 should not see Area 57's
> specific routes"
>
> Is the answer to summarize area 57 routes or to block all routes from 57?
> My answer was former, but the proctor says the other way....
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

--
Narbik Kocharians
CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
CCSI# 30832
Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor) www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE
Training)


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART