From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2007 - 05:39:56 ART
Is it possible to repost the question?
On 2/19/07, Andre Serrao <andreserrao@gmail.com> wrote:
> That was not my idea..To be in the same AS number is one of the
> requirements
> > of EIGRP neighbor relationship. My solution is to have one router (R1)
> > configured with two ASs (10, 20). One AS (10) has to be the same as the
> > neighbor (R2). The route to be seen as external by that neighbor (R2)
> will
> > be in a different AS (20). In R1, you will have to redistribute between
> > eigrp 10 and eigrp 20.
> >
> > I saw some labs from vendors that use the technique of having 1 OSPF
> > router with 2 processes and then redistributing between each process. I
> > think the same idea could be applied to EIGRP.
> >
> > On 2/19/07, dayo@ademuyiwa.com <dayo@ademuyiwa.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > do you think eigrp will see its neighbour if they are not configured
> to
> > > be in the same AS number
> > >
> > > On 2/19/07, Andre Serrao < andreserrao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am trying to catch up with the discussions of this group, and I
> came
> > > >
> > > > across this one (sent 1 month ago) which I believe it's still
> > > > unresolved.
> > > >
> > > > Although I like Bit Gossip's solution, I don't think it's the best
> > > > one,
> > > > specially if a question like that doesn't let you add any new IP
> > > > addresses
> > > > (same restriction as the real exam).
> > > >
> > > > My solution for this question would have the eigrp routers in
> > > > different AS
> > > > and then redistribute between them. However, that would only be
> > > > possible if
> > > > question DOES NOT specify that those routers have to be in the AS.
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody agree with this? And if the AS numbers have to be the
> > > > same, any
> > > > ideas how to solve it?
> > > >
> > > > Andre
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/23/07, Jo Johnson < groupstudyjo@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am working on EIGRP and came across an issue that I can't
> > > > resolve. How
> > > > > do
> > > > > you configure a device to advertise a prefix that is connected to
> > > > another
> > > > > EIGRP neighbor as an External route? With the configuration
> below,
> > > > the
> > > > > route continues to show up as internal with an AD of 90. If I
> take
> > > > out
> > > > > the
> > > > > network statement for that prefix, my neighbor relationship goes
> > > > down and
> > > > > the route is advertised as external. Neither solves my problem.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > router eigrp 99
> > > > >
> > > > > redistribute connected metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map EXTERNAL
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > route-map EXTERNAL permit 10
> > > > >
> > > > > match interface gig 0/0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor) www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART