From: Andre Serrao (andreserrao@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 19 2007 - 13:30:09 ART
That was not my idea..To be in the same AS number is one of the requirements
> of EIGRP neighbor relationship. My solution is to have one router (R1)
> configured with two ASs (10, 20). One AS (10) has to be the same as the
> neighbor (R2). The route to be seen as external by that neighbor (R2) will
> be in a different AS (20). In R1, you will have to redistribute between
> eigrp 10 and eigrp 20.
>
> I saw some labs from vendors that use the technique of having 1 OSPF
> router with 2 processes and then redistributing between each process. I
> think the same idea could be applied to EIGRP.
>
> On 2/19/07, dayo@ademuyiwa.com <dayo@ademuyiwa.com> wrote:
> >
> > do you think eigrp will see its neighbour if they are not configured to
> > be in the same AS number
> >
> > On 2/19/07, Andre Serrao < andreserrao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am trying to catch up with the discussions of this group, and I came
> > >
> > > across this one (sent 1 month ago) which I believe it's still
> > > unresolved.
> > >
> > > Although I like Bit Gossip's solution, I don't think it's the best
> > > one,
> > > specially if a question like that doesn't let you add any new IP
> > > addresses
> > > (same restriction as the real exam).
> > >
> > > My solution for this question would have the eigrp routers in
> > > different AS
> > > and then redistribute between them. However, that would only be
> > > possible if
> > > question DOES NOT specify that those routers have to be in the AS.
> > >
> > > Does anybody agree with this? And if the AS numbers have to be the
> > > same, any
> > > ideas how to solve it?
> > >
> > > Andre
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/23/07, Jo Johnson < groupstudyjo@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am working on EIGRP and came across an issue that I can't
> > > resolve. How
> > > > do
> > > > you configure a device to advertise a prefix that is connected to
> > > another
> > > > EIGRP neighbor as an External route? With the configuration below,
> > > the
> > > > route continues to show up as internal with an AD of 90. If I take
> > > out
> > > > the
> > > > network statement for that prefix, my neighbor relationship goes
> > > down and
> > > > the route is advertised as external. Neither solves my problem.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > router eigrp 99
> > > >
> > > > redistribute connected metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map EXTERNAL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > route-map EXTERNAL permit 10
> > > >
> > > > match interface gig 0/0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART