From: graham@cisco-engineer.com
Date: Sat Feb 03 2007 - 14:58:07 ART
Agreed this was my initial thought
But SW1 and SW4 arent directly attached and each are connected to SW2 and
SW3 via a single link, can a port channel be done over multiple hops?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Yohannan
Sent: 03 February 2007 17:15
To: graham@cisco-engineer.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Switch load balancing
The 3560 offers a "src-dst-ip" option under the port-channel load-balance
command. It sounds to me that that is what the question is looking for.
- Joe
>From: <graham@cisco-engineer.com>
>Reply-To: <graham@cisco-engineer.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Switch load balancing
>Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:06:09 -0000
>
>Hi group,
>
>
>
>I'm working on a question which asks to load balance between two switch
>endpoints 1 and 4
>
>
>
>The layout is
>
>
>
> ----------------- SW3------------
>
>SW1< >SW4
>
> ----------------SW2--------------
>
>
>
>Question in its self is not hard but the sting is, where you have a choice
>you must prefer source/destination ip Balancing?
>
>
>
>Now the load balance method that came to mind was a Layer 3 etherchannel
>and
>port-channel load balancing, but I can't see how that would fit in this
>scenario? Should I ignore the bit at the end which stipulates where you
>have
>a choice?
>
>
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>Graham
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:45 ART