From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2007 - 21:42:18 ART
So does that mean we can live without having deep knowledge of ospf OR bgp,
but you need one of those to survive? :)
I'd agree, for the R&S exam, it is a "routing" and switching exam... For
security there are other things demanding more deep focus.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Marvin Greenlee
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:51 PM
To: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com; gviquez@desca.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: security@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Simple question about the new Cisco CCIE LAB blueprint
Since he CCd the security list, I think that he means the new Security lab.
Routing protocols are NOT really the "heart and soul"
on the new security test. More like a kidney.
Thanks,
Marvin Greenlee
CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
--- anthony.sequeira@thomson.com wrote:
> I would not bother attempting the "new" exam until I considered myself
> possessing "deep" knowledge of routing protocols mentioned on the
> Blueprint.
>
> Routing protocols are still the "heart and soul" of this test. Sure,
> the exam is more vast now with other topic areas such as QoS and
> Security - but you must forget that and become "expert-level"
> with routing and
> switching first.
>
> Just my opinion of course....
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira
> #15626
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Greivin Viquez
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: security@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Simple question about the new Cisco CCIE LAB blueprint
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I will have the CCIE LAB test the next May 3th. I am studying
> according to the new blue print however I have a question in regard of
> the routing protocol.
>
> I do have experience on routing and switching but not that deep to
> troubleshoot a complex BGP/OSPF network.
>
> My question is, with the new rules ?Do I need deep routing knowledge?
> If so ?On what protocols and how deep?
>
> My point of view is, if Cisco will test my knowledge on GRE tunnels
> and network functionality, I must have routing troubleshooting
> knowledge but not BGP, OSPF deep knowledge.
>
> Please advice.
>
>
>
>
> Greivin Vmquez
> System Engineer
>
> DESCA-S&S Centroamerica
> Tel: (506) 586-6464
> Fax:(506) 586-6590
> gviquez@desca.com
> www.desca.com
>
> Este mensaje contiene informacisn privilegiada, confidencial y
> protegida por derechos de autor (C). Si usted no es el receptor
> (es) indicado en
> este
> mensaje (o responsable de la entrega al mismo), no esta autorizado a
> distribuir o entregar este mensaje a ningzn tercero, favor borrarlo y
> notificar a SYS Telecomunicaciones no es responsable por daqos
> causados por ningzn virus que pueda ser transmitido por este correo
> electrsnico. En caso de archivos adjuntos, es responsabilidad del
> receptor la revisisn de los mismos.
> **************************** Privileged,
> Confidential and (C)opyrighted Information is contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee(s) indicated in this message (or
> responsible for delivery of the message to such person), in such case,
> you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, you should destroy
> this message and notify SYS Telecomunicaciones immediately. If you or
> your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail messages of this
> kind, please advise the sender immediately. Please note that SYS
> Telecomunicaciones is not responsible for any kind of damages caused
> by any viruses that may be transmitted by this email. It is the
> recipient responsibility to scan the attachments, (if any).
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date:
> 26/01/2007
> 11:11 a.m.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:57 ART