From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2007 - 00:29:44 ART
Actually I meant that combined they make a single
kidney. You could live without a kidney, but you
better make sure the other organs are healthy and
taken care of, and that the overall route circulation
is good.
Thanks,
Marvin Greenlee
CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
--- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> So does that mean we can live without having deep
> knowledge of ospf OR bgp,
> but you need one of those to survive? :)
>
> I'd agree, for the R&S exam, it is a "routing" and
> switching exam... For
> security there are other things demanding more deep
> focus.
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Marvin Greenlee
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:51 PM
> To: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com; gviquez@desca.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: security@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Simple question about the new Cisco
> CCIE LAB blueprint
>
> Since he CCd the security list, I think that he
> means the new Security lab.
>
> Routing protocols are NOT really the "heart and
> soul"
> on the new security test. More like a kidney.
>
> Thanks,
> Marvin Greenlee
> CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- anthony.sequeira@thomson.com wrote:
>
> > I would not bother attempting the "new" exam until
> I considered myself
> > possessing "deep" knowledge of routing protocols
> mentioned on the
> > Blueprint.
> >
> > Routing protocols are still the "heart and soul"
> of this test. Sure,
> > the exam is more vast now with other topic areas
> such as QoS and
> > Security - but you must forget that and become
> "expert-level"
> > with routing and
> > switching first.
> >
> > Just my opinion of course....
> >
> > Anthony J. Sequeira
> > #15626
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Greivin Viquez
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:03 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Cc: security@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Simple question about the new Cisco CCIE
> LAB blueprint
> >
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I will have the CCIE LAB test the next May 3th. I
> am studying
> > according to the new blue print however I have a
> question in regard of
> > the routing protocol.
> >
> > I do have experience on routing and switching but
> not that deep to
> > troubleshoot a complex BGP/OSPF network.
> >
> > My question is, with the new rules ?Do I need deep
> routing knowledge?
> > If so ?On what protocols and how deep?
> >
> > My point of view is, if Cisco will test my
> knowledge on GRE tunnels
> > and network functionality, I must have routing
> troubleshooting
> > knowledge but not BGP, OSPF deep knowledge.
> >
> > Please advice.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Greivin Vmquez
> > System Engineer
> >
> > DESCA-S&S Centroamerica
> > Tel: (506) 586-6464
> > Fax:(506) 586-6590
> > gviquez@desca.com
> > www.desca.com
> >
> > Este mensaje contiene informacisn privilegiada,
> confidencial y
> > protegida por derechos de autor (C). Si usted no
> es el receptor
> > (es) indicado en
> > este
> > mensaje (o responsable de la entrega al mismo), no
> esta autorizado a
> > distribuir o entregar este mensaje a ningzn
> tercero, favor borrarlo y
> > notificar a SYS Telecomunicaciones no es
> responsable por daqos
> > causados por ningzn virus que pueda ser
> transmitido por este correo
> > electrsnico. En caso de archivos adjuntos, es
> responsabilidad del
> > receptor la revisisn de los mismos.
> > ****************************
> Privileged,
> > Confidential and (C)opyrighted Information is
> contained in this
> > message. If you are not the addressee(s) indicated
> in this message (or
> > responsible for delivery of the message to such
> person), in such case,
> > you may not copy or deliver this message to
> anyone, you should destroy
> > this message and notify SYS Telecomunicaciones
> immediately. If you or
> > your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail
> messages of this
> > kind, please advise the sender immediately. Please
> note that SYS
> > Telecomunicaciones is not responsible for any kind
> of damages caused
> > by any viruses that may be transmitted by this
> email. It is the
> > recipient responsibility to scan the attachments,
> (if any).
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 -
> Release Date:
> > 26/01/2007
> > 11:11 a.m.
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:57 ART