From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Jan 06 2007 - 16:19:54 ART
If you didn't put it in your bc command set and did "show traffic-shape"
what does the output say for your sustained bits per interval???
That will answer your question about the burst size! As for the adaptive
part, it would depend on what the rest of the lab said to determine whether
you'd lose points or not, but in general, overconfiguration isn't a problem
(unless you violate some other rule!).
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 1:45 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FRTS Question: Is the Bc always necessary?
FRTS Question: Is the Bc always necessary?
Just did a Frame-Relay Traffic shaping Task. The task says to provision each
circuit as the CIR of 128k.
Since no other requirements were listed, I did just that:
!
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 128000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
!
In the solution, the Bc was defined.
!
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 128000
frame-relay bc 16000
!
Is it necessary to always manually define the Bc for the lab? Is this a best
practice?
or is the default Bc ok if the task does not ask for it?
Would I have lost points for adding in the adaptive-shaping?
-Ryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART