From: Frank (ocsic@web.de)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2006 - 15:03:54 ART
Standley, Jeffrey schrieb:
Hey Jeff,
great, that works!
Have to clear the process from the side i configured the higher prio.
If i clear the process from R5 again, then R5 will become the DR.
I have rebooted also, but it seems, like R2 might be faster in booting,
so i got this again in the wrong direction.
Frank
> Can you provide theses same outputs from R2 when you clear the ospf process on it?
>
> Jeff Standley
> Network Engineer (CCNP, CCSP)
> The Shaw Group, Inc.
> 4171 Essen Ln
> Baton Rouge, LA 70809
> 225.987.6209
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com <nobody@groupstudy.com>
> To: Wayne <ccie_lab@inetiq.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thu Dec 28 11:21:33 2006
> Subject: Re: ospf priority
>
> Wayne schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> but the question was not to do so.
>
> Any other thoughts why this does not work? Adjacency between two router
> on side R5 set to 255 but
> the other side R2 always wins the election with default prio 1.
>
> Rack1R5#clear ip ospf p
> Reset ALL OSPF processes? [no]: y
> Rack1R5#
> *Mar 1 03:08:13.873: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 150.1.2.2 on
> Serial0/0.125 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
> Rack1R5#
> *Mar 1 03:08:42.191: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 150.1.2.2 on
> Serial0/0.125 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> Rack1R5#sh ip ospf nei
>
> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
> 150.1.2.2 1 FULL/DR 00:01:59 173.1.125.2
> Serial0/0.125
> Rack1R5#
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>> Frank,
>>
>> In lieu of setting the other side to 255, set the side you do not want to be
>> in the election process to 0. This will prevent it from ever becoming a DR
>> or BDR when there is a neighbor relationship formed.
>>
>> w
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Frank
>> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:35 AM
>> To: Ramu Perumal; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: ospf priority
>>
>> Ramu Perumal schrieb:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have cleared already the process. "clear ip ospf p"
>>
>> Currently i have only two routers and they are forming the adjacency over a
>> frame link.
>>
>> R2 keeps winning the election and does not pay attention to the prio. I
>> understand that they could not take over a DR is already elected, but in the
>> case when only two are forming an adjacency...
>>
>>
>> R5
>>
>> interface Serial0/0.125 multipoint
>> ip address 173.1.125.5 255.255.255.0
>> ip ospf network broadcast
>> ip ospf hello-interval 30
>> ip ospf priority 255
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 501
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 503
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 513
>> end
>>
>>
>> R2
>> interface Serial0/0
>> ip address 173.1.125.2 255.255.255.0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> frame-relay map ip 173.1.125.1 205
>> frame-relay map ip 173.1.125.5 205 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp
>> frame-relay lmi-type cisco end
>>
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
>>
>>> In a multiaccess network (i hv seen this in a bcast net) where there
>>> is DR/BDR election, the router that wins the election becomes the BDR
>>> first and then the DR is elected. looks like u hv a similar case....
>>> If you are configuring a non-broadcast network, you can try the
>>> neighbor command to set the priority of the spokes to ZERO.
>>> Hope this helps...
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ramu
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Frank" <ocsic@web.de>
>>> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:48 PM
>>> Subject: ospf priority
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i have a problem with ospf priority.
>>>>
>>>> The task asks not to configure ip ospf interface commands on the
>>>> spokes, so it suggests to configure ip ospf priority 255 on the hub.
>>>> (255 or a higher value as the default 1)
>>>>
>>>> But the hub is not elected as the DR.
>>>>
>>>> What could be the reason for this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rack1R5#sh ip ospf int | inc Pri
>>>> Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State BDR, Priority 255
>>>>
>>>> Rack1R5#sh ip ospf nei
>>>> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Interface
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 150.1.2.2 1 FULL/DR 00:01:36 173.1.125.2
>>>> Serial0/0.125
>>>>
>>>> Rack1R2#sh ip ospf int s0/0 | inc Pri| Des
>>>> Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1
>>>> Designated Router (ID) 150.1.2.2, Interface address 173.1.125.2
>>>> Backup Designated router (ID) 150.1.5.5, Interface address 173.1.125.5
>>>> Adjacent with neighbor 150.1.5.5 (Backup Designated Router)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>> __ Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ****Internet Email Confidentiality Footer****
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
> responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may
> not copy or deliverthis message to anyone. In such case, you should
> destroy this messageand notify the sender by reply email. Please
> advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to
> Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
> other information in this message that do not relate to the
> official business of The Shaw Group Inc. or its subsidiaries shall
> be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
> ______________________________________ The Shaw Group Inc.
> http://www.shawgrp.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:39 ART