From: Raj Bansal (ccie_study06@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 18 2006 - 02:18:12 ART
the question says to prepare for future routers to be added as well. hence 255 is the priority you need to safeguard against future routers to be added to the topology. I configured 100 on the hub and 0 on others and still got it wrong for the reason above.
Xiangling <xianglingzj@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Buddies,
I tried the assessor lab yesterday and got a very strange question. For a
FR NBMA network in which R3 is hub and R1, R4 as spoke. I put R1, R4
priority to 0 and make R3 unchanged. The final result is that I got 0 for
this question and they indicate that because I did not put priority for R3
as 255. Anyone here know the reason that I must set it to 255 instead of
leaving it as default 1? Thanks.
-- Thanks & Regards, Xiangling |-------------------------| | | \ I Love You All / \ / \___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART