From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 18 2006 - 09:44:10 ART
I believe the language would have been more akin to
this wording.
Easily mistaken.
--- Alex De Gruiter <Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au>
wrote:
> Did the question ask something like "ensure that R3
> has the best chance
> of being selected"? Then I would imagine setting the
> priority to 255 is
> correct.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Xiangling
> Sent: Monday, 18 December 2006 1:00 PM
> To: ccie >> Cisco certification
> Subject: OSPF Priority 255 for NBMA hub
>
> Hi Buddies,
>
> I tried the assessor lab yesterday and got a very
> strange question. For
> a FR NBMA network in which R3 is hub and R1, R4 as
> spoke. I put R1, R4
> priority to 0 and make R3 unchanged. The final
> result is that I got 0
> for this question and they indicate that because I
> did not put priority
> for R3 as 255. Anyone here know the reason that I
> must set it to 255
> instead of leaving it as default 1? Thanks.
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Xiangling
> |-------------------------|
> | |
> \ I Love You All /
> \ /
> \___________/
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART