RE: OSPF Priority 255 for NBMA hub

From: Alex De Gruiter (Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au)
Date: Sun Dec 17 2006 - 23:24:59 ART


Did the question ask something like "ensure that R3 has the best chance
of being selected"? Then I would imagine setting the priority to 255 is
correct.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Xiangling
Sent: Monday, 18 December 2006 1:00 PM
To: ccie >> Cisco certification
Subject: OSPF Priority 255 for NBMA hub

Hi Buddies,

I tried the assessor lab yesterday and got a very strange question. For
a FR NBMA network in which R3 is hub and R1, R4 as spoke. I put R1, R4
priority to 0 and make R3 unchanged. The final result is that I got 0
for this question and they indicate that because I did not put priority
for R3 as 255. Anyone here know the reason that I must set it to 255
instead of leaving it as default 1? Thanks.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Xiangling
|-------------------------|
|                         |
\  I Love You All  /
\                     /
  \___________/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART