From: Standley, Jeffrey (jeffrey.standley@shawgrp.com)
Date: Sun Dec 17 2006 - 23:24:43 ART
With the understanding that I have not read the actual requirements....this would only make sense to me if they would have stated something like, if any new devices were ever added to the segment R3 would have to the best chance of being chosen as DR.
Jeff Standley
Network Engineer (CCNP, CCSP)
The Shaw Group, Inc.
4171 Essen Ln
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
225.987.6209
----- Original Message -----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com <nobody@groupstudy.com>
To: ccie >> Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sun Dec 17 20:00:24 2006
Subject: OSPF Priority 255 for NBMA hub
Hi Buddies,
I tried the assessor lab yesterday and got a very strange question. For a
FR NBMA network in which R3 is hub and R1, R4 as spoke. I put R1, R4
priority to 0 and make R3 unchanged. The final result is that I got 0 for
this question and they indicate that because I did not put priority for R3
as 255. Anyone here know the reason that I must set it to 255 instead of
leaving it as default 1? Thanks.
-- Thanks & Regards, Xiangling |-------------------------| | | \ I Love You All / \ / \___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART