From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Dec 17 2006 - 20:40:44 ART
From the way the blueprint appears to be laid out, they're treating it like
an "equal" protocol. Which means that OSPFv3 and RIPng fall into the same
"IGP" category as RIP, OSPFv2, EIGRP do.
That may make it a touch more difficult to reverse-engineer your score
report, but kinda-sorta makes sense. :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 3:22 PM
To: Andre Serrao; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: Detailed score report?
I personally think it depends on the tasks in the ipv6 section.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Andre Serrao
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 2:07 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Detailed score report?
Does anybody know which category IPv6 falls into? Is it IP/IOS Services, IP
IGP Protocols, or IP EGP Protocols?
Thanks,
Andre
On 12/17/06, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I got it straight from the proctor.
>
>
> --- Shaun Nicholson <shauninusa@geordiepride.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Never thought of it like that before but I can see your point and
> > having thought about it I guess it makes sense I just could not
> > imagine anyone behaving in that manor at a CCIE lab. So as always
> > seems to be the case these days a few folks spoil it for the rest of
> > us.
> >
> > Shaun Nicholson CCIE 6705
> > CCNP, CCSP, INFOSEC, JNCIA-M
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Darby Weaver [mailto:darbyweaver@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:24 PM
> > To: Shaun Nicholson; 'V Shekhar'; 'Cisco certification';
> > security@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Detailed score report?
> >
> > The problem was that sitting down with a proctor while informative
> > for some of the candidates, there were others who were obviously
> > very distraught.
> >
> > Does the term "postal" mean anything?
> >
> > So they decided to do away with that practice with a quickness.
> >
> > Yep. It is like that.
> >
> >
> > --- Shaun Nicholson <shauninusa@geordiepride.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I know they provide you with some details for a
> > fail
> > > as it happened to me
> > > about just over a month ago in RTP. A very basic percentage
> > > breakdown of each of the sections of the lab which shows you where
> > > you are weak and guides you on what you need to concentrate on. I
> > > dont know for certain about a pass in the 1 day format, I hear
> > > it's just an email saying you passed no score or anything, but as
> > > I have my 2nd lab attempt next week hopefully I will be able to
> > > confirm this to you soon.... LOL
> > >
> > > I originally took the 2 day format for R&S and
> > have
> > > to say I liked the time
> > > you had to sit down with the proctor at the end of the stages and
> > > discuss the scenarios, it was much more personal, it also gave you
> > > insight into their thinking and in my opinion greatly helped
> > you
> > > in improving your
> > > knowledge of the lab you had just taken. Its not that they gave
> > > you the answers it just allowed you to gain a better understanding
> > > of what they were trying to achieve, plus you felt you got
> > > something for your 1250 bucks.
> > >
> > > Shaun Nicholson CCIE 6705
> > > CCNP, CCSP, INFOSEC, JNCIA-M
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: V Shekhar [mailto:vshekhar25@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 7:24 AM
> > > To: groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; Groupstudy; Cisco certification
> > > Subject: Detailed score report?
> > >
> > > Does Cisco provide detailed section wise score report for pass AND
> > > failed LAB candidates?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > -sHekHar.
> > > CCSP/CISSP/RHCE.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.21/589 - Release Date:
> > > 12/15/2006 5:10 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.21/589 - Release Date:
> > > 12/15/2006 5:10 PM
> > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.21/589 - Release Date:
> > 12/15/2006 5:10 PM
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.22/590 - Release Date:
> > 12/16/2006
> > 5:39 PM
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART