From: Nick Griffin (nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 15 2006 - 01:30:32 ART
Here's some Auto RP verifications to convince myself ?!?
R1#
*Dec 15 04:24:26.726: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from 3.3.3.3, RP_cnt
1, ht 31 <---- Received 3.3.3.3
*Dec 15 04:24:26.726: Auto-RP(0): Update (224.0.0.0/4, RP:3.3.3.3), PIMv2 v1
*Dec 15 04:24:26.834: Auto-RP(0): Build RP-Discovery packet
*Dec 15 04:24:26.834: Auto-RP: Build mapping (224.0.0.0/4, RP:3.3.3.3),
PIMv2 v1, <------ Sent 3.3.3.3
*Dec 15 04:24:26.834: Auto-RP(0): Send RP-discovery packet on
GigabitEthernet0/0 (1 RP entries)
*Dec 15 04:24:29.514: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from 2.2.2.2, RP_cnt
1, ht 31 <------ Received 2.2.2.2 but not sent
*Dec 15 04:24:29.514: Auto-RP(0): Update (224.0.0.0/4, RP:2.2.2.2), PIMv2 v1
*Dec 15 04:24:29.514: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from 2.2.2.2, RP_cnt
1, ht 31
*Dec 15 04:24:29.514: Auto-RP(0): Update (224.0.0.0/4, RP:2.2.2.2), PIMv2 v1
Removed rp announce from R3
*Dec 15 04:25:28.566: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from 2.2.2.2, RP_cnt
1, ht 31
*Dec 15 04:25:28.566: Auto-RP(0): Update (224.0.0.0/4, RP:2.2.2.2), PIMv2 v1
*Dec 15 04:25:37.834: Auto-RP(0): Build RP-Discovery packet
*Dec 15 04:25:37.834: Auto-RP: Build mapping (224.0.0.0/4, RP:2.2.2.2),
PIMv2 v1, <--- Now building mapping for R2
On 12/14/06, Nick Griffin <nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds valid
>
> Lower priority value in BSR is preferred, I believe highest Loopback
> Address is preferred for Auto RP, you can have more than one, highest IP
> wins.
>
> On 12/14/06, Bob Watson <watson.robert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Have a question say you have 2 rp's and you wish to do preferential
> > treatment of 1 over the other ,
> > you can do it a couple different ways
> >
> > 3 options I know of
> >
> > 1 auto rp configured for the best one and then static rp for second best
> > on
> > all the mcast routers
> > 2 static rp configured with override keyword for the best one and autorp
> > for
> > second best ? is this valid
> > 3 bsr configuration with multiple rp's and assign various priority
> > levels to
> > which rp should be prefered
> >
> > the priority keyword in cco it doesnt declare if the higher the number
> > the
> > better or vice versa
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART