From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2006 - 10:51:48 ART
Is it really that much more difficult with an extra
switch or two?
Hmmm...
Well I guess if one introduces the criss-cross for
redundancy.
Maybe if one gets more explicit in terms of
spanning-tree.
Trunking should not pose that many more challenges.
QoS could get more interesting.
VTP - Could get more interesting - but it is
relatively simple as-is - so if you had two switches
or 50 it should not matter as much.
I would actually think that it would be more welcome
as more points would directed towards switching.
Exactly what are you worried about getting more
complex?
DTP?
--- "Kenza@kenza.nl" <sales@kenza.nl> wrote:
> yes i know, but it get complex when you have 3 or 4
> switches, more
> diffuclties then when you have just 2 switches.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Schaffran" <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
> To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:35 PM
> Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
>
>
> > No need to get hung up on the actual number of
> switches.
> >
> > Spanning-tree is the same regardless if there are
> 2 switches or 20.
> >
> > Focus on the technology and you will pass.
> >
> > Tony Schaffran
> > Network Analyst
> > CCIE #11071
> > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> >
> > www.cconlinelabs.com
> > Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Kenza@kenza.nl
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:08 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> >
> >
> > Anybody got lab with only 3 switches to configure
> ? or is it the 4
> > switches
> > which have to be configured.
> >
> > im going to take the exam in januari.
> >
> > thx for your input
> >
> > rgds,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer
> >
>
************************************************************************
> > Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden
> ontleend. Dit bericht is
> > uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u
> dit bericht per abuis
> > hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te
> vernietigen en de afzender te
> > informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij twijfel over de
> juistheid of de
> > volledigheid van de mail contact met afzender op
> te nemen.
> >
> > This message shall not constitute any rights or
> obligations.
> > This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> > If you have received this message in error, please
> delete it and
> > notify the sender immediately. When in doubt
> whether this message
> > is correct or complete, please contact the sender.
> >
>
************************************************************************
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART