From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Mon Dec 04 2006 - 05:25:50 ART
Hi.
I would go for bandwidth here since SMTP traffic can be bulky and can
well tolerate delays whereas LLQ is designed for delay-sensitive one. So
it is kind of bad design to put SMTP in LLQ..
Just my .02SEK.
A.
on 12/2/2006 6:50 PM JB wrote:
> Hi, I am doing a QoS question that asks to "guarantee at least 1.5Mbps
> of the output Queue on the interface"
>
>
> Using bandwidth:
>
> policy-map SMTP
> class SMTP
> bandwidth 1500
>
> Rack1R5#sh policy-map
> Policy Map SMTP
> Class SMTP
> Bandwidth 1500 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
>
> Using priority:
>
> policy-map SMTP
> class SMTP
> priority 1500
>
> Rack1R5#sh policy-map
> Policy Map SMTP
> Class SMTP
> Strict Priority
> Bandwidth 1500 (kbps) Burst 37500 (Bytes)
>
> What I can see from the output is that both reserve 1500kbps
> bandwidth. With the priority however it is guarenteed the LLQ. Do both
> of these satisfy what the question is asking for?
>
> TIA
>
> JB
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:36 ART